Willow ,'Conversations with Dead People'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Now, adding resources whose primary users are us? I'm all for that (cf episode database). But content seems like a deliberate expansion, one whose ramifications and requirements need to be carefully considered.
Yes. That's it exactly, and I think that deliberate expansion rather than organic growth is a dangerous path.
Heh, now that we're finally ensconced on Buffista Island I am definitely getting a "let's pull up the drawbridge" vibe.
I'm fine with that, I guess, but I would like to have a few breadcrumbs out there that might lure in discriminating viewers. I would still like to make up some Anyas for this current season.
I am anti-content.
We have filk. We can Anya all we want. We can write the Great American Novel. We can post it on the site and point neon signs at it.
But I don't think we need to create some whole other thing...
We've been here less than a week. It's heaven-on-a-stick. Before we start with the self-gratifying imperialistic tendencies, let's make sure the needs of everyone currently on the boards have been met, that everything works, and that we've made whatever simple improvements we can that would offer a large return on the effort expended.
Pull up the drawbridge? I've handed the URL out to more people than I ever have. People I've never heard of have shown up and posted.
Where's the vibe you're seeing?
I think that deliberate expansion rather than organic growth is a dangerous path.
What She Said. If you push to hard to make it something other than what it is, it will become something different, but not the something different that you want it to be.
And a 'zine would not be "just a little more work." It would be a lot of work. People would have to rewrite posts as self-contained essays. Other people would have to edit them, and that's a touchy situation even when all the parties involved are getting paid for it. (porn unintentional). Publishing schedules would have to be set and met. Please note the problems folks are having with these very same issues in the Anthology thread (porn intentional). And for what purpose? It takes the site away from what it's built to do -- host discussions. If at some point we wanted to say, here's an archive of stuff people here have written about Buffy, which will be added to on an irregular basis, that's maybe something to consider, but I don't see the point of anything more complex.
OK, (getting read to post a politcal essay the size of the great American novel.)
Pull up the drawbridge?
I overstated it.
Where's the vibe you're seeing?
Just caution. Protecting This Thing Of Ours. Which is appropriate and right.
I think jengod is on to something. We've only been here a week. We've yet to crash the server. We're still on honeymoon with this board, so let's see where moving here takes us.
Also, it is heaven on a stick. So fast, so roomy.
Just caution. Protecting This Thing Of Ours.
Kinda same-old same-old, though, isn't it? Nothing new about that.
I'm looking at the links page again. Our current categories are:
Do those make sense? Do they need to be revamped? And I'm wondering about dead links. Someone mentioned the contre les vampires site -- is it dead? moved? pining fjordwise? And I'm sure there are others. I *think* sa said she'd have a look through, but really it would be great if a couple people could sift through them and make sure they're as useful as possible.