Maybe we can help Tim write? Obviously, we have talent.
Drusilla ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Coffee On My Monitor
This thread is for Buffista quotage. Posts that are profound, witty, or otherwise deserving of immortality go here. This is also Shrift's source for the BRQG, so be aware that if your words end up here, they'll also end up there. Finally, please note which thread spawned the quotage and please white-out anything that might be spoilery to Un-Americans.
billytea in Bitches, at the end of an odd, convoluted but funny post
I'm a guy on way too much caffeine, and I approved this message.
Allyson in Minearverse after reading an article on fandom that was very poorly researched:
males who rule all within the fandom, using their great spoiler penises to keep the women folk down, begging for information.
In Minearverse, tryin' a little spicy talk:
Betsy HP: (Stop ogling my axioms, dammit!)
Kiba Rika: Sorry. They're just such lovely axioms, I couldn't help but stare.
amych: I heard a nasty rumor that some nameless people's axioms are, shall we say, enhanced.
Lilty Cash: And sometimes, the way those participles dangle, you've got to take a peek.
Deena in Bitches, hopefully referring to the Spikelet, but one never knows, really
And the pale prince of darkness is paging his mama.... so off I go.
ita "comforts" us
tommyrot
I think the stompies should tell us comforting lies.
(...kidding...)
ita
We already do.
I mean, we never would. We are way too stalwart and true.
tommyrot in Natter:
And yes, my first reaction had a semicolon.
Punctuation, always funny, context, not needed.
Natter:
shrift: And now I'm writing an actual note, since my mental notes aren't very sticky.
Polter-Cow
So, I was wondering...what, exactly, is Bitches and how does it differ from Natter?
Emily
We few, we hardy few, we band of Bitches...
Actually, I don't know. Somebody told me to go over there to ask about the technicalities of blowjobs in fancy suits and I never left.
Natter:
shrift: I am often extremely lazy.
Although it's possible that my opinion here is one of those '2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2' things.
Especially because it's shrift, and we know, often on glorious HTML, how extremely lazy she is.