No, I don't think so, I'm laying down the law as your future sugar momma. All velcro will be sound only.
Lorne: Snakes? Uh-huh. And they came out of your what? Okay. Okay, well, did they get up there themselves or is this part of a, you know, a thing? No, I'm not judging...Do we fight snakes? Angel: Only if they're giant. Or demons. Or giant demons. Are they giant demon snakes? Lorne: Well, unless this guy's 30 feet tall, I'm thinking they're of the garden variety.
'Lineage'
All Ogle, No Cash -- It's Not Just Annoying, It's Un-American
Discussion of episodes currently airing in Un-American locations (anything that's aired in Australia is fair game), as well as anything else the Un-Americans feel like talking about or we feel like asking them. Please use the show discussion threads for any current-season discussion.
Add yourself to the Buffista map while you're here by updating your profile.
bon bon - Dec 12, 2002 10:05:28 am PST #833 of 9843
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
§ ita § - Dec 12, 2002 10:06:59 am PST #834 of 9843
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
You need to keep the law out of your private life. There are so many uncivil civilian applications that would be just plain fun.
Stealth bondage!
Am-Chau Yarkona - Dec 12, 2002 10:13:39 am PST #835 of 9843
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Stealth bondage!
I want this!
bon bon - Dec 12, 2002 10:20:11 am PST #836 of 9843
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
ita, my dear, I think you misunderstand the point of bondage.
Now, stealth kidnapping, that I may be able to get behind. Theoretically.
billytea - Dec 12, 2002 10:26:45 am PST #837 of 9843
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Not sure if this could come in handy, but I also found a reference to stainless steel velcro.
evil jimi - Dec 12, 2002 11:04:14 am PST #838 of 9843
Lurching from one disaster to the next.
Just going back to the Wombles for a moment: was the video of the original 1970's Wombles, or the new 1990's Wombles? The new version lacks that certain something that made the original version cool.
§ ita § - Dec 12, 2002 11:05:10 am PST #839 of 9843
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think you misunderstand the point of bondage.
No, not really. I figure, hypothetically, that one might want to be restrained in public, without concerning said publc.
Stainless steel could also be an asset.
DavidS - Dec 12, 2002 11:48:13 am PST #840 of 9843
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
ust going back to the Wombles for a moment: was the video of the original 1970's Wombles, or the new 1990's Wombles?
70s Wombles.
edit: No wait. This might be 90s Wombles. It's animated puppettoon stuff. I thought the Wombles were guys in Womble suits.
bon bon - Dec 12, 2002 11:53:32 am PST #841 of 9843
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
No, not really. I figure, hypothetically, that one might want to be restrained in public, without concerning said publc.
Look, if I have to restrain you, you are going to be embarrassed by all the noise it would take to get out. IJS.
evil jimi - Dec 12, 2002 12:05:11 pm PST #842 of 9843
Lurching from one disaster to the next.
70s Wombles.
edit: No wait. This might be 90s Wombles. It's animated puppettoon stuff. I thought the Wombles were guys in Womble suits.
Both series' were animated. The 1990's series was made in Canada, with Canadian-accented voices/narration, while the 1970's series was made in England, with Bernard Cribbens doing all the voices/narration. Also, the Canadian series features about 12 Womble characters, while the UK series only has 7.
The guys in suits were just for things like promotion of the albums etc..
/me realises that he knows way too much about such things...