SA, that was very nice. See, the Buffy/Giles doesn't bite. I'm rather fond of a several bits of it.
When we landed here you said you needed a few days to get space worthy again and is there somethin' wrong with your bunk?
Mal ,'Out Of Gas'
Buffista Fic: It Could Be Plot Bunnies
Where the Buffistas let their fanfic creative juices flow. May contain erotica.
Connie Neil - Feb 03, 2004 7:09:18 pm PST #8458 of 10001
brillig
Deena - Feb 03, 2004 7:39:58 pm PST #8459 of 10001
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara
That is nice, SA, and I don't like Buffy/Giles either.
deborah grabien - Feb 03, 2004 10:25:45 pm PST #8460 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.
Oh, SA, how lovely. Way to work around the Evil Pairing, and make it right!
esse - Feb 04, 2004 4:39:01 am PST #8461 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
I'm hoping it works because it's not explicitly B/G, simply an acknowledgment of their relationship in its proper form whatever way the reader interprets it.
The requirement t shudder was "hot sex," which I blatantly ignored because there was no way on this earth I could have written it.
erikaj - Feb 04, 2004 4:48:31 am PST #8462 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!
I got a read of affection, not groininess. Which I liked.(Is it vain if that also reminds me of that part in "Sweets" where Munch asks about the "deal" between Giles and Buffy, and what's it like to do Wonder Woman?)
Anne W. - Feb 04, 2004 5:18:00 am PST #8463 of 10001
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.
I got a read of affection, not groininess.
I picked that up as well. I think the problem I have with B/G is the same problem I have with 'shipping any trainee/mentor pairing, especially the ones that have such a strong parent-child feel to them. Plus, there's the fact that Giles and Joyce slept togther, which makes the whole idea of B/G just that much more squicksome.
I have a feeling, though, that if I'd started watching Buffy in, say, late S5, that I would be much less skeeved by the notion of the two of them getting together in "that way."
esse - Feb 04, 2004 5:23:44 am PST #8464 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
I don't know. I think I'd still be pretty skeeved. But it might simply be that my current skeeviness about it is overwhelming all other possibilities of non-skeeviness.
Oh, I like that word.
erikaj - Feb 04, 2004 6:13:39 am PST #8465 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!
I started late...much less skeevy.(Not enough for ship-ness, you understand.) But you know, looking at linoleum makes Munch think about sex.
P.M. Marc - Feb 04, 2004 6:44:08 am PST #8466 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
I don't know. I think I'd still be pretty skeeved. But it might simply be that my current skeeviness about it is overwhelming all other possibilities of non-skeeviness.
And yet? You're still not squicked by Cordy/Angel. Freak.
And I say that with love.
DCJensen - Feb 04, 2004 6:46:25 am PST #8467 of 10001
All is well that ends in pizza.
I think I'd still be pretty skeeved.
You'll be taken care of by a young magician and his trusty dragon Gleep?