Mal: Cut it out. Job's not done until we're back on Serenity. Zoe: Sorry, sir. Didn't mean to enjoy the moment.

'Ariel'


Other Media 2: It's Astounishing!

Discussion of comics, graphic novels, and more. Except for capes. No capes!

Please use spoiler font for new releases until after the weekend following release.


Dana - Sep 22, 2011 2:19:15 pm PDT #3813 of 5059
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Holy crap, that's depressing.


sumi - Sep 22, 2011 2:25:10 pm PDT #3814 of 5059
Art Crawl!!!

That is depressing.

ETA: And there is something really odd about that Bat & Cat drawing. . .


Steph L. - Sep 22, 2011 2:26:00 pm PDT #3815 of 5059
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Wait. I read that article. I don't think the article is slut-shaming at all. t edit Did I misunderstand what you wrote, ita?


§ ita § - Sep 22, 2011 2:26:22 pm PDT #3816 of 5059
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

My poor sweet Kory. Let's hope it's just a head injury and she'll come back round.


§ ita § - Sep 22, 2011 2:27:07 pm PDT #3817 of 5059
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't think the article is slut-shaming at all.

The author was accused of slut-shaming with a previous piece. This article contains her rebuttal.


Steph L. - Sep 22, 2011 2:31:21 pm PDT #3818 of 5059
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Okay, I think I misunderstood what you posted. I thought that by

Interesting article about Catwoman and Starfire's sexual escapades. And why it's not slut-shaming.

you meant that the article was about how DC's current writing of Catwoman and Starfire isn't slut-shaming.


Polter-Cow - Sep 22, 2011 2:32:41 pm PDT #3819 of 5059
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

That's how I read it and was confused as well.


§ ita § - Sep 22, 2011 3:54:47 pm PDT #3820 of 5059
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Sorry, the "it" was the article, not the women and DC's writing thereof.

I wonder if there are women with healthy sexual appetites not designed for the male gaze in the reboot. Jury's out on Batwoman for me, since her sexuality makes things different. Also, Wonder Woman is effective not of our culture.

A range of appetites, even.


Kalshane - Sep 22, 2011 4:36:29 pm PDT #3821 of 5059
GS: If you had to choose between kicking evil in the head or the behind, which would you choose, and why? Minsc: I'm not sure I understand the question. I have two feet, do I not? You do not take a small plate when the feast of evil welcomes seconds.

Nice (and, I agree, depressing) article.

Random tangent, WTF is up with Red Hood's lower body in that action shot? It looks like he's wearing inflatable pants.


Steph L. - Sep 22, 2011 4:46:33 pm PDT #3822 of 5059
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Random tangent, WTF is up with Red Hood's lower body in that action shot? It looks like he's wearing inflatable pants.

He is -- it's the bottom half of a fat suit dealie he was wearing as a disguise. Then he tore away the top half (or it exploded off of him; I can't quite remember) (I read the first half in the comic store and rolled my eyes so hard I had to put it down and just buy my damn Batman and leave).