In the Marvel Universe, Thor -- the literal Norse god of Thunder -- was turned into a frog for three issues, including one where his magic hammer turned him into a 6'6" frog-man
Well, yeah, but that was a great Walt Simonson story.
Discussion of comics, graphic novels, and more. Except for capes. No capes!
Please use spoiler font for new releases until after the weekend following release.
In the Marvel Universe, Thor -- the literal Norse god of Thunder -- was turned into a frog for three issues, including one where his magic hammer turned him into a 6'6" frog-man
Well, yeah, but that was a great Walt Simonson story.
I have no idea why comics got such a bad rap.
I picked up the first Chew trade, and it's good stuff. I recommend it.
Did y'all see this Marvel vs. castration anxiety article?
Okay, I buy some of that. But reading into Green Goblin's continued depiction as hermaphroditic because his lower half is obscured by a female form? That's just working at it.
Okay, I buy some of that. But reading into Green Goblin's continued depiction as hermaphroditic because his lower half is obscured by a female form? That's just working at it.
Yeah, but the "get me my coffee" scene was obnoxious.
As I said, I buy some of it. But it sabotages itself.
As I said, I buy some of it. But it sabotages itself.
I would say some arguments are less compelling than others, or a reach. I wouldn't say the thesis itself is undermined.
Thesis, no. Perhaps it's better to say the author undermines their own credibility by seeming out of control on some points. While it doesn't contradict other points of the thesis, I'm considerably less likely to give the author the benefit of the doubt when I spot some times I think they're clearly on message-driven crack.
Perhaps it's better to say the author undermines their own credibility by seeming out of control on some points. While it doesn't contradict other points of the thesis, I'm considerably less likely to give the author the benefit of the doubt when I spot some times I think they're clearly on message-driven crack.
Fair distinction.