Wha-huh? How? How does GC and her GF or Kat and Lori or our friends E &T getting married make my marriage to Joe any less than what it is? Other couples, hets included, do not have any impact on the strength of my marriage. And I resent anyone who tells me that it does.

I think there is a logic to this argument, but I think it goes farther than most people who cite it are willing to go.

I think the logic is that a real, legitimate, true-blue, godly, traditional marriage not only has a man and a woman but that a man has man jobs (being in charge/responsible, taking out the garbage, disciplining the children, whatever) and the woman had woman jobs (submitting graciously to the will of her husband, keeping the house, making babies, etc.) and that ever since we've gotten away from that gold standard society has gone to hell. Look what women's lib has done! And sex before marriage! And G-Spots! The further we get away from our proper roles the further we endanger the institution of marriage and its ability to hold society together. They really REALLY like gender roles. They find them safe and comforting and right (in a way that makes me snort painfully).

(Nevermind that modern equitable marriages seem to work quite nicely, that the 50% divorce rate is a myth, and the good old days never were so good -- I'm not saying its a solid argument.)

Marriage is already on the brink of utter destruction just the way the heterosexuals are doing it. Now we get a bunch of godless sodomites who are not only doing sex in dirty ways, they're not even CAPABLE of following the rules -- and then we'll never get them back.

Its an enormous threat. (But I don't see most people of the people citing "threat" living that sort of a pre-Lib marriage so I snort at them too)

I'm been skimming like mad (I think I have a sleeping sickeness -- I conked out for two hours this morning, and yesterday slept more than three hours on the chair in the living room with the TV on and the kids playing).

Hugs and vibes and ~ma all around.

Although I know there are people out there who believe that gay marriage undermines the institution of marriage in general (which I've always read as holy union! between man and woman!), there are others who claim that gay marriage opens up different issues when it comes to defining a family, and what that means for the legal system and aspects of it.

Health insurance, for one. I think there's a fear that if a gay couple becomes eligible for benefits, there will be a mad rush of people everywhere marrying on bogus terms to claim benefits. Me and a platonic girlfriend, for instance.

I think that argument is bullshit, but that's one of the most common reasons I've read.

::loves on Aimee just because::

Health insurance, for one. I think there's a fear that if a gay couple becomes eligible for benefits, there will be a mad rush of people everywhere marrying on bogus terms to claim benefits. Me and a platonic girlfriend, for instance.

I think that argument is bullshit, but that's one of the most common reasons I've read

It's a bullshit argument, but it also begs the question: How have we as a technologically advanced society come to allow health care to be a luxury? And isn't that, in and of itself, in some way obscene?

Health insurance, for one. I think there's a fear that if a gay couple becomes eligible for benefits, there will be a mad rush of people everywhere marrying on bogus terms to claim benefits. Me and a platonic girlfriend, for instance.

Right, because it's so much easier to be fake gay-married than to be fake het-married, if you're only in it for the health insurance.

And I know I just above said that personal anecdotes are not useful to critical arguments, but when DH and I first moved here, I couldn't be added to his health insurance until we got married, despite having been together for 5 years. If he'd been a woman, we could have claimed same-sex domestic partner status from the get-go. So I really fail to see how legalizing gay marriage will make it easier for people to cheat on their insurance forms that way.

Of course, I also think we should just have universal health care, which would solve the problem from both ends.

How have we as a technologically advanced society come to allow health care to be a luxury? And isn't that, in and of itself, in some way obscene?

So much this. Exactly. It *is* obscene, and criminal. (At least in my personal version of ethics, which is different than morality, I know, but still.)

As conservative as I can be on some issues, the idea that any kind of a loving family is not okay fills me with rage. There are few enough loving families in the first place, and as Cindy pointed out, the number of het marriages/families that make a mockery of the institution is legion.

Where did my high horse come from? I didn't even see it ride in...

It's in UR kitchen, eatin' UR cake.

::snorts cake out my nose, which is quite messy::

Never in one million years would I compromise my values or morals just because it might not make me a clear thinker.

Are you sure your classmate isn't George Bush?

I have a friend who studied biology and the evolutionary evidence points to the possiblity(when you consider all primates) that humans aren't physiologically built for monogomy. I don't know all the details, but the heterosexual, modern marriage is pretty much a blip on the time line of human relationships. It evolved because of child-bearing/rearing, etc. and has worked out mostly.

We have our tree up. It's decorated-from waist-high on up, thanks to grasping toddlers. But it's lit up and festive!

Owen broke my snow globe less than two minutes after I took it out of the box. The floor was covered in glass, water and glitter, and a wee Santa. I'm pretty sure after going over the floor on my hands and knees, twice, that it's all cleaned up.

ok, I know I'm kinda new and all... but I gotta say

:: I love you people!!!! ::

Thanks ND and KT for saying "you should join, they are like minded people" (paraphrase, cuz I don't recall exactly what they said to get me to join). This so reminds me of college, sitting around, chatting about the world, with tangents out the wazoo. (only we usually had a LOT of wine or beer when we did the chatting... this is mostly at work... or rather "work")

:: sits in corner and smiles ::

anyhow, gay marriage. Had a HUGE conversation with sister and rest of family. Their big argument was that marriage was about family and making babies and that gay marriage can't make babies (naturally speaking). Then I politely asked her if she and Dan were pregnant yet (knowing full well that with our genetic muscle disease, she has no desire to pass on the genes). She got flustered... taken aback a bit, and realized the error of her ways, but kept prodding, defending her situation. The rest of the family backed her up, which is when I looked at my Aunt and Uncle (married late in life) and asked them, "so, when are you two gonnna have a baby?" After a bit more redfaced from my sister (and huffs and puffs from A&U), my sister started to see what I was saying. After about an hour, I actually got my sister neutral (but looking in direction of against, but couldn't attack it). The rest of the family is hopelessly closed minded.

Funny, that night, health care was a big topic of it too. Ya, kinda sad how much we spend on health care, and it's NOT universal. When you think about it, we (who have health bennies) are paying extra to cover all those folks who are under/no insurance at hospitals. Furthurmore, out here in LA, not sure about rest of country, we have MANY hospitals and/or ER's closing down. If you don't think that is crisis, you need to get an injury and travel 30 extra miles to the next nearest hospital (in LA traffic!) that has available bed space for you.

oops, sorry ... /rant