But it wasn't just opinion and belief, it was factually wrong. It would be like re-writing the times tables charts. How many kids would think to ask? Why should they have to? Why should it be ok for a teacher to do that in the first place?

confused me. As a nonreligious person I find anybody's idea that they have to fix things so everyone believes what they believe, terrifying.

Thanks for pointing out where I was confusing, beth. I should have said "some" anti-dominionist "bloggers" (because I'm seeing it a lot). It's tinfoil hat time (for the above mentioned), because some people are seeing Dominionism wherever there is Christianity, or in sects/schools of thoughts that are pretty far away from Dominionism. I see way too much equating of one with the other. There are Dominionists out there, and they scare me, too, because I'm pretty sure my Christianity isn't their Christianity, and my "right" isn't their "right" and my free isn't their "free". But (the general discussion) I see about it on the internet (in blogs, primarily) is pretty uniformed.

but if your wrong belief endangers your students, is that permissible?

How was she endangering the students? If she only expressed her beliefs, then I'm still in the free speech zone of things, and you fight what you believe are wrong ideas with the expression of your right ideas.

Maybe it depends on the definition and scope of endangering. I mean, I don't want my girl growing up thinking other people's illegal and immoral reaction to her general presence is her fault. I don't want my boys growing up thinking they can blame girls when they can't control their impulses, because that will land them in prison, where they will be in danger.

Teachers hold a lot of sway with their pupils, which is why schools work to the extent they do, and is a great thing, in the hands of a good, thoughtful teacher. Already though, if I say one thing, and my child's teacher has said another (or said the same thing differently enough that it seems in contradiction to my kids) they are inclined to doubt me, because the teacher is a general knowledge-authority.

Are middle-schoolers considered capable of the same type of reasoning that adults are?

That's a serious question.

No. In fact their brains are not physiologically capable of the same type of reasoning (which is one of the rationales behind the age of consent, by the by).

JZ, that's way worse than my teacher!

I don't know about that. Mine was aggressively sexist and slightly mad, but he never said that women and girls are responsible for their own rape. That's just fucking appalling.

It was an eye opening experience and I lost a lot of respect for some "good" (both academically and I thought morally) students.

Yup. And damn, how awful that they then turned around and pointed fingers at you for saying what they couldn't!

Since then, the few times I've found anything bad enough to speak out about, I haven't even bothered asking other people for support. Complaints and promises beforehand don't mean shit.

Geez Louise- the worst thing my health teacher ever did was tell REALLY personal stories about herself and her kids.

A friend who was a year younger than I was ended up having a health teacher who was male and just out of college. He was from the town, and had been a senior when I was in school, but everyone he "knew" had graduated. I remember laughing and laughing with my friend, because he was always at all the keggers and road parties and it was sort of ridiculous that he was trying to teach her "health". Although, to be fair, most people took health as a freshman, and so the other students in her class weren't at the same parties.

Sparky, I will admit I actively tried to get her fired. I even bugged the administrators about it, etc. I did that because she basically said, child abuse is the child's fault. (because men biologically have to have willing or forced sex when they are aroused).

I never understood how my classmates could like her after that.

Is bon bon around?

From a while ago, but I'm back from court. Drunk though. (We won.)

This has been making the rounds today: [link]

Anonymous Law Firm LLP is one of the world's most celebrated law firms, or at least we like to think so. With clients, attorneys, values and traditions, the Firm holds a place of its own in most directories of legal enterprises. Our lawyers provide a range of billable services to clients, and are familiar with many of the things that attorneys ought to understand. Our global presence reflects the existence of offices worldwide. Our work indicates a longstanding commitment to maximizing profits, and an unparalleled dedication to the perception of success.

(Completely tangentially, theremin was one of the preliminary championship round words in the spelling bee today. She missed it; she put an "a" in the middle of it. It was all very exciting. Can't wait for the finals tonight.)

Wow. Just...wow. God, sometimes I feel bad cause I talk to my kids about sex-ed cause the Health teacher is sue-leery, and I am not formally a Health professional, but...damn, I am aware of my own biases (towards choice, towards contraception, towards tolerance and educations) but now.

God DAMN, people are dumb.

I know the people you are talking about Cindy. In fact, once or twice I've tried to point out that equating Dominionism with Christianity is dangerous, becaause it gives the dominionist more power.

There are Dominionists out there, and they scare me, too

Honestly, I wish I heard this from more Christians.

I had some really great teachers at that school. I think what happened is they had a teacher leave right before winter break and then had to scramble to find a replacement and they made a bad choice. The school nurse was fantastic, I could go to her when I had panic attacks. Her husband taught history and he was a great teacher.