Yeah, because debates never happen here.

It seemed a bit harsh is all.

Cenosillicaphobia

Are there two ells in the root word?

This isn't just polygluttonous perversity?

Well, some of it is. I am fussy, though I've gotten somewhat better as I got older. I discovered I can eat raw spinach, although my tolerance for it is pretty low. Cooked spinach is another bad smell, plus a disgusting texture, bleh. But I quite like cooked spinach as an ingredient in some dishes. Much to my surprise.

It seemed a bit harsh is all.

Spidra, did you feel it was a bit harsh? If so, I do apologise. From where I was standing, I was engaging in a bit of teardown for edification purposes.

Are there two ells in the root word?

Don't ask me, I just copy-paste.

You know what's sad? I could hardly tolerate heat in chile until shortly before I moved away from practically the source of the best green chile ever. That's just not right,

If your assertion is "clearly," then you're some proof short of a point, I think. I don't think it's clear at all, and in fact contradicts the article, as noted. If it's less clear and more an opinion, then that's different to me.

Seemed less than friendly to me. I have no idea how Spidra felt about it.

I do know she apologized to "Spidra, I honestly don't know what answer you're expecting to hear." earlier which stuck me as odd because Spidra's thinking the sandwich was more style than substance isn't what seemed on the rude side to me.

It's less and less pleasant to be here these days and for no good reason.

I just felt I was in a no-win situation there. I wasn't gunning for a debate but if I responded as if I were in a debate, I ran the risk of seeming like I was attacking others. And if I didn't respond, then I feel like it's just assumed my statement is completely unfounded.

I think debate would feel fairly comfortable to me (I am the daughter of an attorney so the house was full of it...so to speak) if I were more sure of my place here. I still feel a bit on the outside looking in.

Anyway, I'll just reiterate that it's damned near never my intention to needle or offend folks so I apologize if that's the effect my posts had.

Don't ask me, I just copy-paste.

Googling shows lots of hits for the double ell. I was just wondering if that was something someone coined and then took off without a etymologist's blessing.

Seemed less than friendly to me.

It was not unfriendly in intent--it's exactly how I argue semantics, and lord knows, that's not something unfriendly. It's more like breathing.

I have no idea how Spidra felt about it.

It's all about how Spidra feels about it.

which stuck me as odd because Spidra's thinking the sandwich was more style than substance isn't what seemed on the rude side to me.

Again, it's Spidra's call. It's possible she's reading this differently from you.

I understand you don't like it when I argue with you, and try and remind myself not to. But I do want to defend myself here.

From the outside of that conversation, none of it seemed unpleasant to me. It is not news that ita likes to push back on what she sees as unsupported statements of fact. It doesn't make it a fight, or debate team, or whatever.

If nothing else, it makes for more interesting conversation than "I like X, what do you like?" "I like X too! Also Y." "Ooh, I hate Y!" Not that I'm not perfectly willing to enagage in that kind of thing. But I do find it much more interesting when it's "Why do you think that? Say more about that." On whatever topic.