I understand the urge to do anything, including lie, to rise to great heights. It's the idea that you're not going to be looked at closely that boggles me. Subtler lies, people!

Missed the latte. Was late in fact. Fires somewhere and tremendously crap traffic.

No previous experience in audits, but hey! he was an ethics lawyer for the White House General Counsel during this admin!

I'm waiting for the administation to appoint a Cylon to be in charge of Department of Computer Defense Against Alien Attack.

Really, all the Cylons had to do was give a bunch of money to Bush's reelection campaign....

ID and young-earth creationism are not the same thing. AFAIK, ID does not exclude big bang theory, because god could be behind that too. ID also professes support for *some* evolution.

I think that many of the ID folks are saying what they think they can get away with, not what they believe. And that a lot of them don't fully understand what the core theories say, they're just attracted to the idea because they think it disproves Darwinism.

Gah. My brain is totally not working today. I spent the last hour and a half fixing a problem, but I kept on making these mistakes (testing using the wrong function, etc.) It really should have taken me less than half an hour.

Now I feel bad that we bill by the hour, so our client has to pay extra because my brain is not working well.

Oh well, they save money when my brain is working extra-clever-like, right?

It's the idea that you're not going to be looked at closely that boggles me. Subtler lies, people!

This is what fascinates me. Here we have an administration that wants to invade the privacy of American citizens without a warrant, but they can't be bothered to check the resume of a political appointee who will be working in an agency that does work with clear implications for national security. Morons.

I just heard an NPR piece about mothers and daughters that made the relationship sound torturous, but one we should cherish anyway. Which is to say, daughters should let mothers nag. Pretty horrible. Luckily my mother has never criticised my clothing other than wondering why I never liked what she tried to buy me. She did weight nag, and has worried about that for years, with various degrees of justification. As for my hair (the third part of the nag trinity) she has long questioned my psychological motivation for my hair. I think she thinks it looks good-she worries about what it means.

Are mothers supposed to be excused for that sort of hassling?

Unrelatedly, I'm one of the most made up women in the room. Lip gloss.

I think that many of the ID folks are saying what they think they can get away with, not what they believe. And that a lot of them don't fully understand what the core theories say, they're just attracted to the idea because they think it disproves Darwinism.

This is ad hominem though. The problem that creationists use ID theory to advance creationism is separate from the problems with the ID theory itself.

The problem that creationists use ID theory to advance creationism is separate from the problems with the ID theory itself.

Hmm. That seems to presuppose that the ID theory has a legitimacy outside of the creationism advancing agenda, no? I'm not sure I'm convinced of that.

One has to distinguish legitimacy from truth, right? I don't think one should assume that ID has no independent validity but rather argue the point.