Gunn ,'Unleashed'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, flaming otters, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Knitted power cord: [link]
This black knitted electrical cord can be worn as a decorative skinny scarf, or even a decorative belt. Use it to pull back your curtains or replace that boring old tie. Wrap it around a gift, or wrap it around your wrist. Whatever you choose to do, let your imagination lead the way!
I'm beginning to suspect that some people who knit are weird....
Hmm. Even if the observation is good, that shows correlation, not causation. Maybe lower levels of stress lead to more penetrative sex? Actually, that makes a fair amount of sense.
Maybe lower levels of stress lead to more penetrative sex? Actually, that makes a fair amount of sense.
How? I mean, "I'm nervous about talking in public, can I put your dick into my mouth" doesn't seem quite intuitive. Or "4 + 4 = 7. Ah, dammit, that's not right, and please keep your penis away from my vagina!"
No, the idea is that a lower level of stress in general might lead to both more ease in public speaking and more interest in penetrative sex.
I'm not sure I buy it, and I'm also not sure what would be the point of it if true, but the problem with the headline (and the news's generally sloppy handling of it) is the assumption of causation.
the idea is that a lower level of stress in general might lead to both more ease in public speaking and more interest in penetrative sex
But I still don't get the idea of penetrative sex being linked in that direction to lower stress. Why would it be? More than the other way round?
I was thinking more that lubrication and relaxation are more likely to go well if one has lower levels of stress than otherwise. That's not going to explain the men -- maybe higher levels of stress are communicated to their partners? -- but that's what I've got.
I was thinking more that lubrication and relaxation are more likely to go well if one has lower levels of stress than otherwise.
But then you need more detail about why there wasn't penetrative sex...did they intend to and couldn't physiologically pull it off? Did they never intend to? Did things never get that far because it all fizzled?
But then you need more detail about why there wasn't penetrative sex
I do? I was proposing an alternate explanation, not stating a conclusion that I intended to support with research.
For example -- and I am pulling this out of my hindparts:
It's the billion other details that get my hindparts in a twist, personally. But the above scenario is a more logical psycho-social explanation for the study's findings than "If you only were straighter and narrower, you'd be less tongue-tied in front of a crowd!" as if the g-spot plugged directly into the social-skills part of the brain.
I was proposing an alternate explanation, not stating a conclusion that I intended to support with research.
Fine. Turn down a golden opportunity for a paper. Or we can read it as you plural, the general you. If one doesn't know why penetrative sex didn't happen, how strong an explanation is it? For one, that is.