You know, before, when I was startled at the bank Chris Rock was making for Rush Hour 3? I take it back. I have no startle left over after learning that Jennifer Aniston makes $9M a picture.
'Time Bomb'
Natter 40: The Nice One
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
That is startle draining.
Wow. Ummm, are her movies that successful?
On Invasion, was that deputy who was talking to the sherrif (why is it impossible for that word to look right?) - the same actor that played the soldier on Nip/Tuck this week?
Hey, our replicators are here!
Huh. No one seeked interested in that story when I posted in Bitches last week. I should have quoted.
Fuck fuck fuck. A roach was just on me!! I HATE THAT. I felt a little tickle on my arm, but I thought it was just the cat or something, but then I saw the roach on the sofa next to me, and EW. I womanfully grabbed a napkin and KILLED IT. Just ew, though.
Now I have to finish a paper but I'm all creeped out.
I actually think the former maxim is still endorseable
And impossible.
Not sure what you mean. When you do the categorical imperative calculation, which could be just one ethical standard, you imagine what if everyone followed the rule you're endorsing-- what are the consequences? I think if everyone followed the maxim
My personal ethics are in adopting the rules of the store/community/country when I cross over into it.
Then people would have no reason not to adopt completely unfair rules. I don't think the adoption of a rule by someone whose space you occupy is enough reason to find breaking it unethical. I don't think you are endorsing this, which leaves me a bit puzzled. I have plenty of non-ethical, self-interested reasons why I would follow the rules. But I think your rule crosses over into adopting everyone else's preferences into your ethics.
I think your rule crosses over into adopting everyone else's preferences into your ethics.
Well, you didn't reprint the part where I say this works in some scenarios and not in others.
I think your rule crosses over into adopting everyone else's preferences into your ethics.
Assuming that it was 100% applied (which I have stated is not the case), it would cross over into me accepting other people's preferences when I'm in their domains, with no onus on me to be in everyone's domain and certainly not simultaneously.
The fact that the rule only works in some scenarios and not others is why I think it's not a good rule. And why following that rule is therefore not a matter of ethics.
I never called it a rule. It's also a bad poem. So what?
My personal ethics are in adopting the rules of the store/community/country when I cross over into it.
Why wouldn't this be a rule, though? If it's a principle that only works sometimes, I feel like it's not a good principle.
This is making my head hurt. You should tell me to stop if it makes yours hurt, too. I feel bad for arguing with you on the day of your MRI.
Edited to fix quote.