maybe Kristen didn't even know who it was?

Either RT or KB said this in an interview (I can't remember which one or where I read it). So her reaction is meaningless.

Yeah, just for the record, I lurve the show but didn't like that damn cliffhanger business. Especially knowing the reaction was meaningless. Gives me shades of the annoyance of the Buffy S6 cliffhanger, when they didn't tell James Marsters what Spike was actually going for. I hate that shit.

Oh, no, there's a chain of malls (Westfield? something like that) that has those banners all across the country.

It is one of our "Westfield Shopping Towns."

Huh. I went off on how part of the fun of the show is knowing so many of the locations. When they found Duncan in Argentina (?), I was all, "That's Balboa Park!" The building he was sitting outside - Casa del Prado Theatre. I walk past it every week on my way to dance class.

So her reaction is meaningless.

This is lame.

Speaking of gender, there is also the question of "Does RT have as much Mother Issues as Joss has Daddy Issues?". But I think in VM, it's more like Parent Issues. The intergenerational conflict is an essential part of the show, so while you have Lianne Mars and Lynn Echolls abandoning their kids and Celeste Kane with her rampant favoritism and general bitchiness, you also have Aaron Echolls and all his horrors and Jake Kane, who may have loved his kids, but still a criminal and a terribly flawed figure. At least the show has Keith, and to a lesser extent Alicia (Wallace's mom), to counteract the whole "the parents are bad, mmkay?" thing.

When they found Duncan in Argentina (?)

Cuba.

But I think in VM, it's more like Parent Issues.

Very much. I mean, look at "Silence of the Lamb." There's an undercurrent of "Do our parents, be they biological or non-biological, make us who we are?" throughout the whole series. Obviously with Keith and Veronica, and certainly, Logan is probably afraid of becoming his father. Don't really know about Duncan's feelings, though. The Duncan/Jake dynamic isn't explored a whole lot, although we know that Jake has really big plans for Duncan, whether he likes it or not.

Cuba.

Right. I stand corrected (and slightly embarassed/shamed at having forgotten so quickly).

the whole "the parents are bad, mmkay?" thing.

This is just wandering through my brain...Could it be more of a "Rich parents are bad" thing? Veronica's Dad, Wallace's Mom, we've seen the money struggles, but these are our "good kids." Or look at Mac, raised with the "wrong" middle class family, she's great and we love her. The girl raised rich by her "real" parents? Total bitca. ie rich parents=bad parents? (Oh oh and Weevil! A Criminal, but with a "Heart of Gold." Rich parents are bad!)

Hey, Veronica Mars thread!

Well, to be fair, Madison's "parents" (the rich ones) are decent--what little we've seen of Mac's biological mother anyway, as are Mac's adopted parents, for all their shortcomings. What bothers me more about that storyline is that it argues that Nature triumphs over Nurture, and does so in a decidedly unambiguous fashion. The Veronica & Keith dynamic is a little more complex, as while Veronica is Keith's daughter, she's also Lianne's. The Echolls family horror show is a mixed-bag: while Aaron is a classic example of the abused-becoming-an-abuser, I don't think we're being led to believe that it's an inescapable fate for Logan--I mean, there are warning bells, as evidence by Logan's proclivity for violence and impulse control, but I don't think the show is as bleak and nihilistic as to suggest that Logan's beyond saving.

What bothers me more about that storyline is that it argues that Nature triumphs over Nurture, and does so in a decidedly unambiguous fashion.

I don't see this. Please explain?

I don't see this. Please explain?

Mac, despite being brought up by nachos-and-NASCAR parents, turned out like her biological falafels-and-Fellini parents.