Jon, you should be able to close threads now. Holler if you still can't.
Where'd they get CAT scan from?... I mean, did they test it on cats? Or does the machine sort of look like a cat?
Dawn ,'Sleeper'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Jun 29, 2007 9:37:39 am PDT #1335 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jon B. - Jun 29, 2007 10:17:55 am PDT #1336 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
It seems to be working. Thx.
§ ita § - Jul 02, 2007 11:02:14 am PDT #1337 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I've (hopefully) closed two of the bugs now--fixed the thread creation, and fixed it so that you can assign a folder on thread creation.
Well, they're fixed on .org. Now I have to port those fixes to css.net.
§ ita § - Jul 02, 2007 11:11:42 am PDT #1338 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jon, where were we with the changes to the CSS site? I'm not at my email and I don't remember if there was something I was supposed to be doing.
I kinda want to switch over.
Jon B. - Jul 05, 2007 7:32:09 am PDT #1339 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Sorry, ita. I saw your post on Monday, but was running out the door and then forgot about it.
If I recall correctly, the only problem I had with the CSS formatting was that if-there-is-a-very-long-string-of-unbroken-text-it- makes-the-columns-overlap-with-each-other-in-some-browsers. Since there are other issues with really long unbroken lines (like horizontal scroll bars) that usually cause the poster or a stompy to fix the offending text anyway, I would say that we can go forward without fixing it.
Ideally, it would be nice to have the separate 2-column CSS separate from the 3-column CSS, but I don't think it's necessary.
t on edit But of course now I can't seem to replicate the problem... Grrr....
§ ita § - Jul 05, 2007 7:37:13 am PDT #1340 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Cool.
I'll find a quiet moment to switch things over. Late one night soon, probably.
Jon B. - Jul 05, 2007 7:41:02 am PDT #1341 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
There's also the quickedit defaults that didn't seem to be consistent with the current site. "b" should default to "strong". I know you disagreed, ita, but I think it's confusing to the user if the default for a "b" shows up as italic.
Also, the "]" indent doesn't seems to do anything.
§ ita § - Jul 05, 2007 7:47:56 am PDT #1342 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The ] is parsed into t blockquote --I have no idea why that's not showing up onscreen.
As for what b parses to--like I said--I don't care enough to fight for it.
Jon B. - Jul 05, 2007 8:26:48 am PDT #1343 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
The ] is parsed into <blockquote> --I have no idea why that's not showing up onscreen.
I guess that's a bug, then?
As for what b parses to--like I said--I don't care enough to fight for it.
Does not caring mean that you'll change it, or that you can't be bothered to change it?
§ ita § - Jul 05, 2007 8:31:55 am PDT #1344 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I guess that's a bug, then?
A confusing one. I mean, the HTML has t blockquote and t /blockquote in it, and the tag isn't overriden by the CSS as far as I can tell.
As for the t b change--already made.