I guess that's a bug, then?
A confusing one. I mean, the HTML has t blockquote and t /blockquote in it, and the tag isn't overriden by the CSS as far as I can tell.
As for the t b change--already made.
Some people juggle geese!
Wash ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Jul 05, 2007 8:31:55 am PDT #1344 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
DXMachina - Jul 05, 2007 9:13:59 am PDT #1345 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Note: I fixed a long piece of unbroken text in Jon's post #1338 that was giving me a horizontal scroll bar in Firefox.
Jon B. - Jul 05, 2007 9:32:14 am PDT #1346 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I fixed a long piece of unbroken text in Jon's post #1338
Ha!
the blockquote thing is weird. I'll have to compare the b.org source vs. the css.b.net source and see if i can spot any meaningful differences.
Jon B. - Jul 06, 2007 1:05:47 am PDT #1347 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
ita -- I looked through the source code, and I have no idea why the blockquote tag isn't working on the css server. So I made a small change to the code. In the same way you grepped the ">" to be a cite tag, and then defined "cite" in the stylesheet, I made the "]" quickedit into a dfn tag and added it to the stylesheet.
It was a simple change, but let me know if I did anything stupid.
DXMachina - Jul 10, 2007 4:17:55 pm PDT #1348 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
There's something weird going on in the Other Media thread. It looks as though there is an unclosed italics tag somewhere, but I'm damned if I can find it. It starts here:
Daisy Jane "Other Media 2: It's Astounishing!" Jul 10, 2007 5:28:42 pm PDT
The thing is, DJ used the quick-edit for italics, not the <i> tag, so it should've closed. None of the other posts seem to have the tag. It's very mysterious.
eta: And Jon figured it out. It was in the next post's tag.
Jon B. - Jul 10, 2007 5:17:00 pm PDT #1349 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Yeah, it took me a bit to figure it out. t pats-self-on-back
Nora Deirdre - Jul 16, 2007 11:41:40 am PDT #1350 of 4673
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
I have a question- are the geo mailing lists disabled? I just tried to send something out to somervillains@buffistas.org and got a bounceback:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
: 205.214.170.170 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) Giving up on 205.214.170.170.
Jon B. - Jul 16, 2007 11:48:51 am PDT #1351 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
The b.org mailing lists have nothing to do with yahoo. If you got a bounceback from yahoo, it's because one of the Somervillains has a now-defunct yahoo.com email address.
DXMachina - Jul 16, 2007 11:49:47 am PDT #1352 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
They should be working. I was able to log into the administrative interface, and that seems to work just fine. I'm not sure why your getting the rejection.
eta: And Jon comes through.
Nora Deirdre - Jul 16, 2007 11:58:06 am PDT #1353 of 4673
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
hm, ok, I was stupid to put the yahoo thing in there- I sent it FROM a yahoo account which is why that reference is there. Also, the C&P failed because of the auto formatting. Here's the actual thing:
somervillains@buffistas.org>: 205.214.170.170 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) Giving up on 205.214.170.170.
And if it is just a rejection of someone's mailbox in the group, did either of you get the email I sent about Monday night's dinner? If not, then there's a problem...