Jon, where were we with the changes to the CSS site? I'm not at my email and I don't remember if there was something I was supposed to be doing.
I kinda want to switch over.
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Jon, where were we with the changes to the CSS site? I'm not at my email and I don't remember if there was something I was supposed to be doing.
I kinda want to switch over.
Sorry, ita. I saw your post on Monday, but was running out the door and then forgot about it.
If I recall correctly, the only problem I had with the CSS formatting was that if-there-is-a-very-long-string-of-unbroken-text-it- makes-the-columns-overlap-with-each-other-in-some-browsers. Since there are other issues with really long unbroken lines (like horizontal scroll bars) that usually cause the poster or a stompy to fix the offending text anyway, I would say that we can go forward without fixing it.
Ideally, it would be nice to have the separate 2-column CSS separate from the 3-column CSS, but I don't think it's necessary.
t on edit But of course now I can't seem to replicate the problem... Grrr....
Cool.
I'll find a quiet moment to switch things over. Late one night soon, probably.
There's also the quickedit defaults that didn't seem to be consistent with the current site. "b" should default to "strong". I know you disagreed, ita, but I think it's confusing to the user if the default for a "b" shows up as italic.
Also, the "]" indent doesn't seems to do anything.
The ] is parsed into t blockquote --I have no idea why that's not showing up onscreen.
As for what b parses to--like I said--I don't care enough to fight for it.
The ] is parsed into <blockquote> --I have no idea why that's not showing up onscreen.
I guess that's a bug, then?
As for what b parses to--like I said--I don't care enough to fight for it.
Does not caring mean that you'll change it, or that you can't be bothered to change it?
I guess that's a bug, then?
A confusing one. I mean, the HTML has t blockquote and t /blockquote in it, and the tag isn't overriden by the CSS as far as I can tell.
As for the t b change--already made.
Note: I fixed a long piece of unbroken text in Jon's post #1338 that was giving me a horizontal scroll bar in Firefox.
I fixed a long piece of unbroken text in Jon's post #1338
Ha!
the blockquote thing is weird. I'll have to compare the b.org source vs. the css.b.net source and see if i can spot any meaningful differences.
ita -- I looked through the source code, and I have no idea why the blockquote tag isn't working on the css server. So I made a small change to the code. In the same way you grepped the ">" to be a cite tag, and then defined "cite" in the stylesheet, I made the "]" quickedit into a dfn tag and added it to the stylesheet.
It was a simple change, but let me know if I did anything stupid.