A shade of a man.
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
But he is hard to phantom, sometimes.
They're discussing "Gone" over on Mark Watches, and I'm reminded that this is the episode that mentions Marcie (the original Invisible Girl) because Rio happened to be in the writing room when they were breaking the story and said, "Hey, are you going to do a callback to the other invisible story from Season One?" And the writers said, "D'oh! Good catch."
What! That's cool.
What! That's cool.
Yup! What? You thought we only had an "ita moon" to our credit?
And the leather pants reference Lorne makes to Angel, right? After his Beige Angel period? (Possibly in "Happy Anniversary"?)
I also bullied Tim into admitting that Cordelia wouldn't carry a stake in her purse in case Angel went bad, especially after she found out that a Taser would work on Vamps. So he upgraded her to Taser.
From Mark's review of "Gone":
The only thing I worry about is something happening that would trigger Willow into using magic.
I have a feeling he will come to regret that phrasing...
I have a feeling he will come to regret that phrasing...
After the whole Spuffy kerfuffle he casually mentioned that there probably wouldn't be anything as controversial in the season yet to come.
"Seeing Red" in t-minus 7 episodes...
I've seen it discussed, here and elsewhere, about Wesley's tendency to assume whatever option hurts him personally is The Correct And Moral Choice. Mark's review of Birthday suddenly got me wondering whether it was a general thing the show says, in light of Cordelia's choice to keep the visions and be demonized. Angel seems pretty willing to accept punishment, but he has a lot of genuine guilt. Do you think Fred or Gunn are ever put in that position, or other characters?