Aw. Ellis is a big softie.
'Soul Purpose'
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
It's calling all Buffy fans Buffistas, Strega. Sorry I wasn't clear about that. I was wondering why that immediately bugged me so much. It did, and I can't figure any rational reason for it at all.
Well it immediately brought to mind that asshat at (I think it was) Whedonesque (I was wrong), who was saying "Buffistas" were never real Firefly fans (which is probably why I read Ellis' quote the way I did), and it was fairly obvious he meant "Buffy-verse fans".
No asshats at Whedonesque. Oh no. That particular asshat was at fireflyfans.net.
I'm not sure when "buffista" became a universal term, but I know Ellis is hardly the first to use it that way.
Really? I mean, aside from the guy at WhedonesqueFireflyfans?
I can't figure any rational reason for it at all.
Because it's our word for us, and he's using it to mean something else?
Maybe not strictly rational, but understandable.
aside from the guy
Well it struck me as odd when he used it that way, but it didn't strike me as unprecedented. I could be misremembering.
Or maybe you're less, because you're rejecting Joss-approved works in the universe.
that raises an interesting question -- if the creator creates an AU, is that canon or no? or is it new canon? or is it "comic book canon"? hmmmmmmm
And the original vision may just be the movie.
nah. Joss said that the movie wasn't true to his original vision
(umm, you know that I'm just playing devil's advocate because I'm bored, right? I don't really care)
I've seen "buffista" used in print (to mean generic Buffy fan) more than once.
Which is disturbing the fuck out of me as well.A world of ewww and nooooooo!
damn, we should have trademarked. I mean, we were using buffista as early as 1997 or 98