We're taking a moment ... and we're done.

Oz ,'Chosen'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


tiggy - Aug 01, 2005 10:05:09 am PDT #1536 of 10458
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

good point, ChiKat. i guess Spike would essentially be the same thing.

though, how do they know what happened to them pre-curse? how do they have those memories of being a bad-ass vampire?


§ ita § - Aug 01, 2005 10:09:37 am PDT #1537 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Did the gypsy curse give Angel Liam's soul back?


tiggy - Aug 01, 2005 10:15:23 am PDT #1538 of 10458
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

I would assume so, but from what we've been shown Liam was pretty much a bastard and re-souled Angel never struck me as such.

do you think the gypsy's just pulled a soul out of the ether and didn't care if they were cursing the right person or not?


§ ita § - Aug 01, 2005 10:16:34 am PDT #1539 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

do you think the gypsy's just pulled a soul out of the ether and didn't care if they were cursing the right person or not?

Angel was the one being cursed -- not the soul, in my reading. They may have given him a fresh new soul.


Topic!Cindy - Aug 01, 2005 10:20:14 am PDT #1540 of 10458
What is even happening?

so if Liam's soul went to the afterlife after Darla vamped him, he won't know what his physical body did after that fact.

The Restoration Curse recalled Liam's soul from "the ether." In the Jossverse, the soul does not seem to be sentient. Or at least, the soul does not does not seem to house all sentience, because we know people like Jesse knew Xander et al, after vamping, as well as he did before vamping. And we know that having his soul, having it taken away, having it restored (and repeat) did not affect Angel's memory more than momentarily.

Did the gypsy curse give Angel Liam's soul back?

I say yes, because it is a "Restoration" curse, not an "Ensoulment" curse. It makes it much simpler to discuss, as well.


tiggy - Aug 01, 2005 10:20:31 am PDT #1541 of 10458
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

but now we're getting back to what makes us us. is it the soul?

technically Angel doesn't have a soul since vampires are soulless creatures, right? so wouldn't they be cursing the human soul that was Angel, which would be Liam?


DavidS - Aug 01, 2005 10:22:08 am PDT #1542 of 10458
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I think Joss finally settled on the notion that "soul" in the Buffy/Angelverse was something like "the inclination to do good" - which is pretty flimsy stuff theologically.


Topic!Cindy - Aug 01, 2005 10:22:54 am PDT #1543 of 10458
What is even happening?

I wrote up a whole big thing on soul canon (and my guestimates added in) in the Jossverse, once. Let me see if I can find it. Plei has a copy on one of her sites, but it's unproofed. I think I saved a somewhat edited copy, somewhere.


Matt the Bruins fan - Aug 01, 2005 10:22:58 am PDT #1544 of 10458
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

It's pretty clear that the Gypsy ritual has restored the same soul to Angel each time it's been used, though. I think the simplest assumption to proceed from is that it calls up the soul that's supposed to go with the body.

edit: x-post with Cindy.

Neither Angel nor Darla seemed to have any memories from their souls' disembodied states, but Buffy did remember her afterlife.


P.M. Marc - Aug 01, 2005 10:24:20 am PDT #1545 of 10458
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Cindy: [link]