But Cindy, how was the torture vital? What did it reveal? I'm saddened at the idea of physical pain being used to extract information that the possessor doesn't know is important. It's not a memory jogging device.
Natter 33 1/3
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
There has been an awful lot of torturing going on this season. Not sure how I feel about it, actually. Dramatically, it's been effective, but man, there's been a lot. And all by the good guys, too.
I couldn't tell what was going on in the preview. It seemed very "No, wait! We didn't really wrap everything up mid-season! Look, explosions!"
The first time we met Paul, I said, "Oh, he's totally evil." But now I'm less sure.
[eta:
Actually, I half-take back what I said about the torture being dramatically effective. Because last night, my main impression was that it was being used only to drive a wedge between Jack and Audrey. Which I felt was a little cheap, even if it was completely in character for both of them.]
I have less against dramatic torture than many people, probably, but I really prefer it being performed on the good guys. It's weird this way.
(Also, I keep wanting to call her Aubrey, because her love interest's name is Jack.)
I must now leave work early in order to go to an "appointment" which I implied was medical, but is actually to get my hair cut. Woo Hoo!
That would have made me want to call her Will.
As I recall, 24 has a long history of torture. In its 2nd season, Jack was the torture-ee, and nearly died before recovering well enough to continue the frantic day. In one year (can't remember which), Jack tortured someone by faking that he was murdering the torture-ee's family. In all cases, it's pretty much effective if the torturer is a good guy, and ineffective if the torturer is not.
Of course, this was the show that started season 2 with the murder and decapitation of someone, by the hero, for a very inane reason, and with no consequences at all. So, NSM with the reflecting of real life.
Personally, I think that if someone Tasered me in the completely unnecessary course of duty, I would be looking for an opportunity to Taser them back, hopefully in the goolies.
I was a home birth, but I'm not sure what street my parents lived on. Alberta, maybe? Which would give me Hilda Alberta. Or, ooh, I keep forgetting that our other cat's name at the time was Bunny. I could be Bunny Beach! OK, actually, I'm totally sticking with Bunny Beach from now on.
I must now leave work early in order to go to an "appointment" which I implied was medical, but is actually to get my hair cut. Woo Hoo!
Robin, you are an inspiration to us all.
My assertion of the effectiveness is directly opposite to yours. I think in this season's scenario it raises ethical questions I'm pretty sure they aren't going to deal with.