I mean, data-miners and expose reporters do it already, so I know that pawing through the trash for stuff you might want is not illegal. And if you do something with the stuff you want, and there are consequences...?
I don't see how this analogy fits the situation.
I mean, what would a judge do about someone who conceived as a result of pawing through a man's trash for kleenex? It's perfectly legal to paw through a man's trash; she's not committing any crimes. But, I'd like to establish a precedent whereby male excreta may be considered a dead ball beyond a certain point.
E.g., right now, you have to get a court-order to extract semen from a man after his death, right? And not just any shmuck off the street can file for that court-order, either. I'd sort of like to find out how that all plays out while the guy is still alive.
It's ten o'clock. Do you know where your sperm are?
Sperm salvage. Same old attractive nuisance. New twist.
t /12
She didn't dig for it.
If his claim is true, and she deceptively collected it, he didn't give it to her. Those are the words I'm going by, and I don't see the grey area there.
Are we assuming the condom, or was that in one of the reports?
Honestly, I don't remember, but isn't one of them saying there was only oral sex, not vaginal? To make a baby via oral sex, there's got to be a way to transport the semen into the right place. Subtly.
I'm thinking it's really irritating to be subjected to "And then Wayne Brady said!" sort of conversations in the vicinity.
Oh, lord. My one coworker and I spent MONTHS constantly yelling about how we had to choke a bitch.
To make a baby via oral sex, there's got to be a way to transport the semen into the right place. Subtly.
She could just run to the bathroom after he gifted her.
She could just run to the bathroom after he gifted her.
This may explain why the relationship didn't last.
She could just run to the bathroom after he gifted her.
That's why I said subtly. I mean, I guess she could jump up without speaking, but come on! Even then, I don't see how you end up with a baby. But I guess anything's possible. Or someone's lying.
If his claim is true, and she deceptively collected it, he didn't give it to her. Those are the words I'm going by, and I don't see the grey area there.
I do, depending on how she came to be in possession of it. If it was deposited by him, with her, I can't see that she deceptively collected it, because he willing engaged in the act with her. Granted, if she did secretly impregnate herself with it, she used it more, and in ways that differed from what he expected, after he assumed she was done with it. Don't get me wrong. I think if she did this, it was reprehensible. I still don't see why the child should suffer. And I do think that his suit should go forth.
Yeah, I'd like to know more about the method. If there weren't condoms involved, I'm imagining, "Excuse me, but I have to go spit in a turkey baster."
If it was deposited by him, with her, I can't see that she deceptively collected it, because he willing engaged in the act with her.
He deposited it in her mouth. No ovaries in there. Just by engaging in oral sex, I don't think that implies the level of responsibility you think accrues with sexual intimacy.
