Saffron: He's my husband. Mal: Well, who in the damn galaxy ain't?

'Trash'


Spoilers 3: First Mutant Enemy, Now the World

[NAFDA] Spoilers for any and all currently running TV shows. All hardcore spoilage, all the time. No white font.


Gus - May 21, 2005 2:50:50 pm PDT #975 of 3486
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

World != white, world !=black.

I get that, in so many ways.

I am truly sorry I brought race into the discussion.

... heroes to save the world -- there might not be anything left...

Nevermind what Jack does on a weekly basis. He is not a hero. In fact, 24 may not have a hero.

That supposition alone rocks.

Still, I worry some about how Joe Sixpack identifies with Jack, and how the torturing seems justified to him.


§ ita § - May 21, 2005 2:59:03 pm PDT #976 of 3486
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I am truly sorry I brought race into the discussion.

Who's talking about race?

Jack is a hero. He's not a tradtionaly 21st century Western hero, but he's still a hero in this Buffista's books. I dare not speak for the rest of them.

He's a brave and focussed man, whose goal is saving as many lives as possible. He's just willing to sacrifice more than most heroes we're given -- more of his own (drug addiction) and more of those around him (the white hat that saved his life).

I don't use the definition of anti-hero that says "shares attributes with the villain," because that presupposes that villains and heroes are that polarised. I don't use the definition of "tragic flaw" or "questionable means" either. Spike is (or has been) more of an anti-hero as I define the term. Doing good without caring about good, for instance. I'm trying to think of my other sort of anti-hero, the one too broken to do good. Nothing comes readily to mind.


Gus - May 21, 2005 3:09:37 pm PDT #977 of 3486
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Black -vs white comes down to "race", for me. That may be a personal problem.

Set all of that aside.

Jack is not a good guy. He is expediant, at best.


§ ita § - May 21, 2005 3:24:29 pm PDT #978 of 3486
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Black -vs white comes down to "race", for me. That may be a personal problem.

It is a problem when you start applying race to other people's positions when they're not discussing it.

How do you define hero or good guy? Do you believe, in life and death conflicts that they exist in real life? If not (or, hell, even if you do) do you look to fiction for that purity, or do you not enjoy fiction less if it presents you a not-good guy as the protagonist (if Jack's not a good guy, what term do you use to distinguish him from both the good and bad guys?)

Who else isn't a good guy? Is Mal a good guy? Jack Bristow?


Steph L. - May 21, 2005 3:27:55 pm PDT #979 of 3486
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Forget "We Are The World" -- Michael is the whole world all unto himself.

Heh. I meant his charming little ditty "Black and White."


§ ita § - May 21, 2005 3:29:36 pm PDT #980 of 3486
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I know -- I was just riffing from there.


Steph L. - May 21, 2005 3:32:07 pm PDT #981 of 3486
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

'K. Just checking. I can live with my quips being unfunny to anyone but me, but I do hate it when, funny or not, the references are obscure.


Gus - May 21, 2005 3:34:57 pm PDT #982 of 3486
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

How do you define hero or good guy?

A hero is someone whose actions I should emulate. A bad guy is someone I should appose.

I should emulate Mal. He loves. I should not emulate Malwan. He does not love.

Mr. Bristow loves. This also pisses him off.

Jack of 24 does not love. He calculates.


Gus - May 21, 2005 3:36:23 pm PDT #983 of 3486
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

stoopid double posts


§ ita § - May 21, 2005 3:41:15 pm PDT #984 of 3486
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Don't worry, Steph. No insect reflections here.

Jack of 24 loves, both big and small. He loves the big (the lives of the many) more than he loves individuals, and loves other people more than he loves himself.

Mr. Bristow loves. He loves one thing, with every fibre of his being. He wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice others, for that one thing's continued wellbeing. He wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice himself either.

Bauer saves the world because he cares about it. I swear, Bristow saves the world because it's his day job. And if his daughter didn't do it and/or didn't like it, he'd stop. Bauer would not. He might try, but it wouldn't take.

Is Jack of Lost a hero?