You were very nearly devoured by a giant demon snake. The words 'let that be a lesson' are a tad redundant at this juncture.

Giles ,'Selfless'


Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned  

A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Sue - Feb 04, 2005 11:04:30 am PST #8824 of 10001
hip deep in pie

I found Titanic interminable and overblown. And I kept thinking "You've got two minutes to live in the North Atlantic, die Leo, die!" And the more people cried around me in the theatre, the more hysterical the movie seemed to me.


Gris - Feb 04, 2005 11:05:10 am PST #8825 of 10001
Hey. New board.

I like Titanic a lot more now than I used to. I re-watched it very recently.

I hated it then because I was 14. And Every. Single. Girl. I. Knew. Saw it. Eighteen thousand times.

Which was just WRONG.

However, I actually like the romance - I always like cheesy romances - and I love that they at least are fairly accurate about the sinking of the ship, and I personally think the acting and directing and costume design and cinematography are all tremendous. The melodramaticism goes just a little too far with ice!Leo, but that's my only complaint, really.

Oh, and why'd she throw the frickin' diamond away? That was just stupid.


§ ita § - Feb 04, 2005 11:08:04 am PST #8826 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'll never be able to tell you if Amistad is a good movie or not. I started crying before they reached American soil, and I didn't stop until I left the theatre. Its emotional impact on me and its quality, however, I see as potentially independent things.

Titanic was kinda like that, except the idea of waiting around for the human tragedy while the annoying people pranced? So not going to happen. And I didn't dislike Leo or anything. The A story was more boring than the truth, and distracting. I didn't need to be seduced into sadness. It's all over the story.


JohnSweden - Feb 04, 2005 11:08:22 am PST #8827 of 10001
I can't even.

I found Titanic interminable and overblown. And I kept thinking "You've got two minutes to live in the North Atlantic, die Leo, die!" And the more people cried around me in the theatre, the more hysterical the movie seemed to me.

So much This. What was said earlier about cobbling a romance onto a historical treatment (perhaps silliest in Pearl Harbour?) also.


Matt the Bruins fan - Feb 04, 2005 11:13:16 am PST #8828 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

And I kept thinking "You've got two minutes to live in the North Atlantic, die Leo, die!"

I was hoping that hypothermia wouldn't be (melo)dramatic enough for Cameron and he'd go for a shark making off with Leo's lower half before he could freeze to death.


Vonnie K - Feb 04, 2005 11:13:56 am PST #8829 of 10001
Kiss me, my girl, before I'm sick.

I saw Titanic with a full bladder, and the last 30 minutes agonized me somethin' terrible, what with all that water on the screen. Might have impeded my enjoyment of the flick a bit.

Overall, I think it's a decent flick with some really moving bits, but the hysterical audience overreaction about how it was the BFE got tiresome real quick. There was also the small matter of that Accursed Song That Played Everywhere All The Time for, like, 10 months. By week 4, it was inducing almost-Pavlovian homicidal response in me.


Nutty - Feb 04, 2005 11:16:08 am PST #8830 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

I'll never be able to tell you if Amistad is a good movie or not.

Unfortunately, and despite a number of good performances, it's not. It was about as anvilicious as one might hope to avoid, including one hilariously overblown Melodramatic Moment Of Articulating The Point Unnecessarily (tm Spielberg). It has its good moments, but overall -- felt like homework.

I think disaster movies of the fictional sort are the place where romances belong -- bring on the mooshy star-crossage, I say. But when it's theoretically real, then star-crossage just stands out in its obvious unreality: too clean, too nice, too fake. For some reason, couples never have a fight and then die still hating each other.

By the same token, nobody likes to make movies out of the awkward and/or disgusting disasters. Unless there has been a movie about the Molasses Flood I don't know about? I guess it is just hard to make drowning (or even better, boiling to death) in molasses come across in a cool/exciting way.


juliana - Feb 04, 2005 11:21:33 am PST #8831 of 10001
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

For some reason, couples never have a fight and then die still hating each other.

War Of The Roses. Which is the exception that proves the rule, I'll grant you.


Nutty - Feb 04, 2005 11:23:52 am PST #8832 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Well, but in The War of the Roses, they weren't feuding in the middle of a ship flipped upside down in the ocean, or on the lip of a volcano, or anything.

It might have been even funnier if they had been, however. I could stand to see Michael Douglas drown in molasses.


tommyrot - Feb 04, 2005 11:32:37 am PST #8833 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I could stand to see Michael Douglas drown in molasses.

And then he could be eaten by molasses sharks.

(Which are not as fast as the regular kind.)