Maybe because Hugh Jackman is more of an actor, so his name on a movie doesn't actually tell us anything about the film? Whereas Cruise of Roberts or Hanks always deliver a certain set of attributes which their films are designed to highlight? (and when they don't, like Hanks in Road to Perdition, their fans are unhappy).
Dream Girl ,'Bring On The Night'
Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Whereas Cruise of Roberts or Hanks always deliver a certain set of attributes which their films are designed to highlight?
That was one of the thrusts of the article, yeah. Actors are making more diverse choices, so they're less attached to an overriding persona.
Better for the actors -- less good for the business of Hollywood?
Can Reese be the next Hepburn? I surely do love me some Reese.
Can Reese be the next Hepburn?
Audrey or Katherine?
Katherine, I think.
Anyone who could pull off Election definitely has Kate's spunk.
Yeah, she works much better as a Kate.
We need a new Audrey. But i'm not sure that anybody will ever be able to be her again.
Audrey's particular charms were unprecedented and, I think, unduplicable.
My sister kind of looks and acts like her, sometimes. She does an excellent impression of her in Roman Holiday, especially.
Too bad she's not really interested in becoming a movie star.
Ah, okay then. I would certainly say we do create celebrities now, nsm movie stars.
And yeah, hardly anyone knows who Christian Bale is.