No, you can have a multi-faceted proposal, though. I don't think you got your four seconds for the first one yet, if that makes any difference as to what you decide to do.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Yes, I did. Zenkitty was the fourth.
I think you got three. Hec seconded you. Denise thirded you. Zen fourthed you.
Fourthed
Wait, didn't SA want to modify her proposal to role in the other change? I'm confused.
SA, do you want to revise the proposal and get a second round of seconds?
the initial proposal is NOT what has to be the final proposal out of lightbulbs, right?
Yes, in the past I'm sure the final proposal changed through discussion in lightbulbs.
Fwiw, my two cents is that--apart from the non-fiction bucket thread--I would prefer to have single show threads in the "TV" folder so that we can follow whatever shows we want to follow and be spoiled for whichever we choose to be spoiled for at whatever pace that we are able. If that ain't gonna happen, as I suspect is that case, then Natter whitefont is my preference.
I've already given up on discussing anything but non-fiction in b.org, but I don't want to be complicit in my silence.
Catching up, so if I'm repeating things, I'm sorry.
I also don't like the impact that I felt they had on Natter and the board as a whole. That part for me is not so fine.
I really want to hear more about this. I didn't particularly notice any real change in Natter, etc., but I won't say I was paying much attention to where I was then. All of which is to say, I wasn't aware of any particular change. So arguing for the threads is easier for me - where and what differences am I not seeing? I'm not cool with upending Natter or board tone etc. if we don't have to.
[And now I feel like I'm all "PROVE YOURSELF TO ME" which I don't mean at all. Just, I'm not getting it, and I want to understand better.]