The next time you decide to stab me in the back... have the guts to do it to my face.

Mal ,'Ariel'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Amy - Jun 02, 2007 1:03:47 pm PDT #9553 of 10001
Because books.

The way I'm reading the comments here, it seems that the solution that would work for the majority of people (except those opposed to thread proliferation) would be to have single-show threads for every show we want to discuss. And I don't think that's really feasible.

My only idea for keeping TV discussion in Natter is to use Natter as a watch-n-post, night-of-airing venue, with whitefont -- the way it always was for everything but Buffy and Angel, once upon a time. At least for those people who don't want to be spoiled for other shows. I agree, though, that having discussion of the same show in different places is logistically confusing.

If anything, I think one of the things this experiment clarified is the way people use the board. I have a hell of a hard time keeping up in Natter, and while skimming through white font about a show I don't watch should make that easier, I usually end up skipping to the end of the thread anyway, if I'm really pressed for time, so I never discussed TV much in there anyway.

I don't like the fact that some of us feel board culture has changed, although I agree with SA that the ship might have sailed in any case. None of which is really useful, I know, but I wanted to say it anyway. I'm a big compartmentalizer, so the threads worked well for me, even skipping discussion of shows I had missed. But I'm also, as noted above, an egregious skipper and skimmer, and miles of white font kills me after a while.


Denise - Jun 02, 2007 1:10:08 pm PDT #9554 of 10001

I hope that there is at least someone willing to propose a Non-Fiction/Reality thread while the rest of all this is sussed out. There are many reality shows on this summer(Hell's Kitchen! Starts on Monday!) and I would hate to not have this particular thread to discuss them, especially as I haven't really seen anyone object to it, unless I missed something.


esse - Jun 02, 2007 1:25:19 pm PDT #9555 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I don't have a problem with doing that. If there is a problem, we can talk about it before it goes to Lightbulbs. Otherwise, this is a formal proposal.

Proposal: To create a new permanent television bucket thread like the Experimental Non-fiction Thread, name to be determined. This thread will be a NAFDA thread.


DavidS - Jun 02, 2007 1:37:01 pm PDT #9556 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Seconded.


Denise - Jun 02, 2007 1:40:20 pm PDT #9557 of 10001

Thirded.

Thanks, SA. I would have done it but I'm not around enough in the day to answer questions, deal with revisions and all that.


Zenkitty - Jun 02, 2007 2:09:25 pm PDT #9558 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Does it need a 4th? Fourth.


esse - Jun 02, 2007 2:13:23 pm PDT #9559 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I am tempted to add in a second part to the proposal, folding Cable Drama into Premium, with 24 hour wfront. Particularly with The Closer and Rescue Me coming up soon, and the number of posts I have seen agreeing with the thought. Is there a particular reason not to?


Topic!Cindy - Jun 02, 2007 2:15:17 pm PDT #9560 of 10001
What is even happening?

I think you'd want to re-propose. And recollect your seconds.


Zenkitty - Jun 02, 2007 2:16:28 pm PDT #9561 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

May I suggest making that a separate proposal?


esse - Jun 02, 2007 2:19:11 pm PDT #9562 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I think you'd want to re-propose. And recollect your seconds.

Well, yeah. That's why I'm asking.

You can't have two proposals simultaneously, can you?