Sometimes a thing gets broke, can't be fixed.

Kaylee ,'Out Of Gas'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


esse - Jun 02, 2007 9:21:19 am PDT #9531 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

We all have our own way we use the board and generally I like to limit the threads to a number that I can use Read New.

Heh. Truer words, because I didn't even know what the Read New function was for until we were a year into our setup here at the Phoenix. I still never use the Read New function. it would drive me crazy!


Laura - Jun 02, 2007 9:36:13 am PDT #9532 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

Hee, SA. My sistah in so many ways, and as opposite as a daughter in others.


Jesse - Jun 02, 2007 9:59:23 am PDT #9533 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I don't mind whitefont in Natter but I dislike being 200 posts behind in one day because something exciting happened in a TV show that I don't follow.

That's so funny, because I'm the exact opposite -- what could be easier than "catching up" on a conversation I'm not following and can't see? Nice and quick!


Laga - Jun 02, 2007 10:01:57 am PDT #9534 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

what could be easier than "catching up" on a conversation I'm not following and can't see?

True, but then I skim and I miss posts that aren't about the TV show.


Lee - Jun 02, 2007 10:06:35 am PDT #9535 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Because of this, the feel of natter has shifted for me.

I'm going to broaden this a little-- it's changed the feel of the board for me, in that I'm far less likely to talk about TV anywhere here than I was before. (Supernatural is the one exception to that, obviously, but even some of that has shifted to email and AIM.) The bucket threads just don't work for the way I watch TV, and I usually don't feel comfortable bringing TV stuff up in other threads.

I can and do discuss TV other places, of course, but the lack of TV discussion that I can actively participate in makes the board seem less accessible to me.


Zenkitty - Jun 02, 2007 10:13:25 am PDT #9536 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

I don't understand why you're less likely to talk about tv anywhere here now, Lee. Do the bucket threads work less well than Natter for you because of the white font issue?


Lee - Jun 02, 2007 10:24:04 am PDT #9537 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Do the bucket threads work less well than Natter for you because of the white font issue?

In a way-- I almost never watch show when the network airs them, so I can't discuss them when aired. Even when I have seen show A close to when aired, I can't go into the bucket threads to discuss it because I haven't seen show B or Show C which are also being discussed.

As gentle as the thread nannying in Natter and elsewhere is, it is still there. Even without it, the fact that people are discussing shows in the TV threads limits the amount of discussion that can be generated outside of them.


esse - Jun 02, 2007 10:56:19 am PDT #9538 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

In a way-- I almost never watch show when the network airs them, so I can't discuss them when aired.

But how does that change when there's more television discussion in Natter? If you're not watching them when they've aired, you miss them in natter as well. Television discussion in natter is both wfronted and disappears quickly, relatively speaking--it's unlikely that something discussed on one day will still be discussed three days hence.


Lee - Jun 02, 2007 11:08:50 am PDT #9539 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

But how does that change when there's more television discussion in Natter

Two reasons: first, in Natter I didn't have to be worried about being spoiied for other shows since all discussion was whitefonted. That holds true whether or not I see shows when aired or not. Also, this

it's unlikely that something discussed on one day will still be discussed three days hence.

didn't hold true for me. I've been able to post a couple of days after GA aired, for example, and generate discussion. In the TV threads, I didn't feel comfortable coming in two or three days, because there were other shows that had just aired being discussed. (eta: I should say though, that I gave up on the experimental threads after about a week, since it was clear they didn't work for me, so I may not have a good basis for that feeling.) It might not be as in-depth a discussion as what happened when aired, but there was discussion.


Kate P. - Jun 02, 2007 11:12:31 am PDT #9540 of 10001
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

In a way-- I almost never watch show when the network airs them, so I can't discuss them when aired.

See, I share SA's confusion, because to me this is a great argument for having a dedicated thread in which to discuss certain shows. If I don't get around to watching show A until three or four days after it airs, it'll be nigh impossible for me to find or drum up discussion of it in Natter. (I should say, this is my recollection of how Natter works, since it's probably been a couple of years at this point since I've been in there.) But with a dedicated (or bucket) thread, I can easily find other people's posts and chime in with my own thoughts.

edit: doh, x-post!