So that's my dream. That and some stuff about cigars and a tunnel.

Faith ,'Get It Done'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Laura - Jun 02, 2007 8:37:03 am PDT #9527 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

I didn't use the experimental threads much because my time was limited during their duration and I didn't sub to them. And yet, I have opinions!

Whitefont in tv threads bugs me, while whitefont in Natter amuses me. For me the tv threads are fun for watch 'n post and the discussion immediately following a show. Whitefont messes with that function. It is fine with me for people to have a bucket thread for their shows but I will likely make random whitefont comments in Natter for shows not in Boxed Set or individual show threads.

We all have our own way we use the board and generally I like to limit the threads to a number that I can use Read New. Only on the weekends to I get an opportunity to check out the other threads.

And with that I will leave the discussion of the potential future of new bucket threads to those that found them useful.


Laga - Jun 02, 2007 8:49:26 am PDT #9528 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

I also missed the TV threads but I might as well chime in. I don't mind whitefont in Natter but I dislike being 200 posts behind in one day because something exciting happened in a TV show that I don't follow. I think people should be free to talk about any topic in Natter but if some of the TV discussion happened someplace else it would make it easier for me to stay caught up on the board.


Connie Neil - Jun 02, 2007 9:09:11 am PDT #9529 of 10001
brillig

One effect I perceived in Natter re: discussing TV was my personal reluctance to babble delightedly about Bones when there was a serious discussion going on. It felt gauche in the extreme to interrupt, say, someone worried about their children's health with "OMG, did you see DB in that tight wife-beater!" It's the kind of thing that makes people in real life give you one of Those Looks. But I can babble all I like about it in the TV thread.

Why not a Bones thread as opposed to a bucket: The medical shows are related, somewhat, and sometimes something you saw in House informs something you see on Bones. True, you could whitefont, but it feels more organic to have the entire range of Network Drama, for example, available for the discussion.

I can work with 24-hour whitefont, and I don't think any topics should be shooed out of Natter.


Monique - Jun 02, 2007 9:19:36 am PDT #9530 of 10001

As someone who's sort of on the sidelines of the board culture, I wanted to add something (but feel free to disregard):

It's really hard for someone like me, who comes in and out, to follow a bunch of different whitefont rules for different threads -- I know the rules are at the top of each thread page, but I still find it confusing. Perhaps that's my own fault, and perhaps if someone really wants to become part of the board it's up to them to sink or swim. But it just seems like different rules for different TV threads is problematic.


esse - Jun 02, 2007 9:21:19 am PDT #9531 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

We all have our own way we use the board and generally I like to limit the threads to a number that I can use Read New.

Heh. Truer words, because I didn't even know what the Read New function was for until we were a year into our setup here at the Phoenix. I still never use the Read New function. it would drive me crazy!


Laura - Jun 02, 2007 9:36:13 am PDT #9532 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

Hee, SA. My sistah in so many ways, and as opposite as a daughter in others.


Jesse - Jun 02, 2007 9:59:23 am PDT #9533 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I don't mind whitefont in Natter but I dislike being 200 posts behind in one day because something exciting happened in a TV show that I don't follow.

That's so funny, because I'm the exact opposite -- what could be easier than "catching up" on a conversation I'm not following and can't see? Nice and quick!


Laga - Jun 02, 2007 10:01:57 am PDT #9534 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

what could be easier than "catching up" on a conversation I'm not following and can't see?

True, but then I skim and I miss posts that aren't about the TV show.


Lee - Jun 02, 2007 10:06:35 am PDT #9535 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Because of this, the feel of natter has shifted for me.

I'm going to broaden this a little-- it's changed the feel of the board for me, in that I'm far less likely to talk about TV anywhere here than I was before. (Supernatural is the one exception to that, obviously, but even some of that has shifted to email and AIM.) The bucket threads just don't work for the way I watch TV, and I usually don't feel comfortable bringing TV stuff up in other threads.

I can and do discuss TV other places, of course, but the lack of TV discussion that I can actively participate in makes the board seem less accessible to me.


Zenkitty - Jun 02, 2007 10:13:25 am PDT #9536 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

I don't understand why you're less likely to talk about tv anywhere here now, Lee. Do the bucket threads work less well than Natter for you because of the white font issue?