Bunnies frighten me.

Anya ,'Help'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


esse - Apr 10, 2007 8:06:06 am PDT #8949 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

There are even still those who don't want to see us going to general tv. It seemed like that used to be a value of ours.

I don't think that has ever been a community value of ours. It was the value of some, perhaps, but we've always (for a value of always that means since WX) discussed television generally. The format in which we've done it has changed. And it seems like there's enough support for discussing television with a more definitive structure that perhaps that value, if it existed, has changed as well.

And? If we're actually better off with the way things are right now, we would likely have evidence of that.

Indeed. And we wouldn't find ourselves coming back here again and again to hash this out.

So how does one do this proposal thingie? David, did you still want to do it? If I were to do it, which I don't have a problem with, I would wait to see if there were more responses to what I've outlined above, whether there's enough general support to take it in to lightbulbs where it could be refined, and with the limitation that this is a trial run until the end of May, at which point we would have a second poll to determine whether the community thought such threads worked.


bon bon - Apr 10, 2007 8:06:30 am PDT #8950 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Yeah, what Brenda said. I think we are talking about what kind of proposal would make sense to the most people, not an intent to vote against any proposal.


bon bon - Apr 10, 2007 8:21:05 am PDT #8951 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

If we're thinking an experimental thread, I'd suggest waiting to create the categories until we see what happens with the thread, what draws discussion, whether there's too much whitefont, etc., etc. For example I know a lot of shows can be termed procedural, but most of those shows don't draw a tremendous amount of discussion (how much Law & Order is there to talk about, really). I'd say leave Premium as it is, create *one* thread for thirty days in the hated drama category, see what shakes out. This is just a suggestion. Three or four experimental threads might be too much data to deal with.


aurelia - Apr 10, 2007 8:23:21 am PDT #8952 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.

Procedurals Thread - House, The Unit, Without a Trace, CSI(s), Numb3rs, jericho (?), Bones, The Closer, Cold Case, NCIS, Criminal Minds, Law and Order(s)

Dramedies - Ugly Betty, The Office, Studio 60, Monk, Psych, Grey's, Gilmore Girls, The Boondocks, others(?)

Serious Drama - 24, Friday Night Lights, Prison Break, others(?)

UK TV - Spooks, Hustle, Robin Hood, maybe Doctor Who as it airs in the UK, and keep Doctor Who as it airs in the US in Boxed Set?

This is the sort of direction I was thinking. "Procedurals" as more episodic and "Serious Drama" as longer arc stories? (If so, I'd move Jericho). (I'd also add Brothers & Sisters to "Serious"). The season-length descriptor certainly helps in defining an expanded Premium.


Liese S. - Apr 10, 2007 8:24:13 am PDT #8953 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I never considered that a community value

Well, I guess (perhaps unsurprisingly?) we see things differently then.

I perceive the general tv issue and thread proliferation as two separate issues. In fact, one of the iterations of this idea involves consolidation rather than expansion. It's not a numbers game.

To me, general tv is a cultural issue and thread proliferation is primarily a technical one, although of course it does have community ramifications.


DavidS - Apr 10, 2007 8:25:07 am PDT #8954 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I'd say leave Premium as it is, create *one* thread for thirty days in the hated drama category, see what shakes out. This is just a suggestion. Three or four experimental threads might be too much data to deal with.

What do people think? An F/X thread? A general drama thread? A procedurals thread?


Steph L. - Apr 10, 2007 8:28:29 am PDT #8955 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

If we're creating only one thread for the purpose of the experiment, I'd say general drama.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 10, 2007 8:30:46 am PDT #8956 of 10001
What is even happening?

If we're going to go white font anyhow, I wouldn't specify any genre. I suspect people will mostly talk about drama, but since we'd be experimenting to see what people want to talk about -- let's just let the people talk, and see what comes out.


DavidS - Apr 10, 2007 8:46:59 am PDT #8957 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

If we're going to go white font anyhow,

Did we agree to do that? I hate white font in show threads.

People don't white font in the Premium thread. I think it really inhibits discussion because you have to be conscious of how you phrase everything.

I'd rather spoilerphobes beware policy. Is that undoable?


Connie Neil - Apr 10, 2007 8:48:12 am PDT #8958 of 10001
brillig

Procedurals Thread - House, The Unit, Without a Trace, CSI(s), Numb3rs, jericho (?), Bones, The Closer, Cold Case, NCIS, Criminal Minds, Law and Order(s)

This is where I'd be.