Mmm. Wife soup. I must've done good.

Wash ,'War Stories'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Liese S. - Apr 10, 2007 8:24:13 am PDT #8953 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I never considered that a community value

Well, I guess (perhaps unsurprisingly?) we see things differently then.

I perceive the general tv issue and thread proliferation as two separate issues. In fact, one of the iterations of this idea involves consolidation rather than expansion. It's not a numbers game.

To me, general tv is a cultural issue and thread proliferation is primarily a technical one, although of course it does have community ramifications.


DavidS - Apr 10, 2007 8:25:07 am PDT #8954 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I'd say leave Premium as it is, create *one* thread for thirty days in the hated drama category, see what shakes out. This is just a suggestion. Three or four experimental threads might be too much data to deal with.

What do people think? An F/X thread? A general drama thread? A procedurals thread?


Steph L. - Apr 10, 2007 8:28:29 am PDT #8955 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

If we're creating only one thread for the purpose of the experiment, I'd say general drama.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 10, 2007 8:30:46 am PDT #8956 of 10001
What is even happening?

If we're going to go white font anyhow, I wouldn't specify any genre. I suspect people will mostly talk about drama, but since we'd be experimenting to see what people want to talk about -- let's just let the people talk, and see what comes out.


DavidS - Apr 10, 2007 8:46:59 am PDT #8957 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

If we're going to go white font anyhow,

Did we agree to do that? I hate white font in show threads.

People don't white font in the Premium thread. I think it really inhibits discussion because you have to be conscious of how you phrase everything.

I'd rather spoilerphobes beware policy. Is that undoable?


Connie Neil - Apr 10, 2007 8:48:12 am PDT #8958 of 10001
brillig

Procedurals Thread - House, The Unit, Without a Trace, CSI(s), Numb3rs, jericho (?), Bones, The Closer, Cold Case, NCIS, Criminal Minds, Law and Order(s)

This is where I'd be.


bon bon - Apr 10, 2007 8:51:44 am PDT #8959 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

I can't imagine a broad based TV thread where no one is expected to time-shift. I say whitefont as we do in natter. Works for us fine there.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 10, 2007 8:58:30 am PDT #8960 of 10001
What is even happening?

Did we agree to do that? I hate white font in show threads.

If we're talking about a provisional/experimental thread, I think it would be best. More people would feel free to try it out, without fear of being spoiled for May Sweeps. If the experiment ends up showing us we do need some TV threads (either show specific or buckets) we may end up white fonting in some and not in others. But for the experiment, I think it would be kindest.


Hayden - Apr 10, 2007 8:59:50 am PDT #8961 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

I hate whitefont, too, and like the idea of piloting a general drama, rather than general tv, thread.


Connie Neil - Apr 10, 2007 9:01:31 am PDT #8962 of 10001
brillig

That's a lot of whitefont