From the looks of things, Baskerville was scheduled for September. Which it no longer is.
It can be closed for potential reopening as easily as LotR, but from an outsider's perspective, I'm not sure if the experiment worked.
Spike ,'Potential'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
From the looks of things, Baskerville was scheduled for September. Which it no longer is.
It can be closed for potential reopening as easily as LotR, but from an outsider's perspective, I'm not sure if the experiment worked.
I was for it, but it didn't work in practice. I think there may be a way to make a Buffista book club work, but this wasn't it.
So, is there a proposal to close it?
I was enthusiastically for it when the idea first came up, but I see it as something we tried that didn't really work out. No harm, no foul. Sometimes ideas just don't pan out.
I'm glad we tried. I'm sorry that it didn't work. I think it's time to move on.
There should be no proposals until the current one's done.
unless of course Tom wants to add that language in to his final proposal for the vote. ijs.
Well, that's not happening here.
Is there a problem with queuing up another proposal for Lightbulbs?
Is there a problem with queuing up another proposal for Lightbulbs?
This came up previously, and I don't remember that it quite got settled. Recently, people have been asked to hold off on a proposal until the current one was done, but I was pretty sure there have been times in the past when we've queued proposals.
I suppose there's the danger of getting an overly bloated queue and forgetting what order votes should happen in, but in general, I would think we could handle it.
What's not to like about queuing proposals?
The difficulty involved in typing the word queue over and over again?