I was for it, but it didn't work in practice. I think there may be a way to make a Buffista book club work, but this wasn't it.
Mal ,'The Train Job'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
So, is there a proposal to close it?
I was enthusiastically for it when the idea first came up, but I see it as something we tried that didn't really work out. No harm, no foul. Sometimes ideas just don't pan out.
I'm glad we tried. I'm sorry that it didn't work. I think it's time to move on.
There should be no proposals until the current one's done.
unless of course Tom wants to add that language in to his final proposal for the vote. ijs.
Well, that's not happening here.
Is there a problem with queuing up another proposal for Lightbulbs?
Is there a problem with queuing up another proposal for Lightbulbs?
This came up previously, and I don't remember that it quite got settled. Recently, people have been asked to hold off on a proposal until the current one was done, but I was pretty sure there have been times in the past when we've queued proposals.
I suppose there's the danger of getting an overly bloated queue and forgetting what order votes should happen in, but in general, I would think we could handle it.
What's not to like about queuing proposals?
The difficulty involved in typing the word queue over and over again?
I think you lose your momentum, but it's not my momentum to be lost.
Proposals can run back to back, right? There's no already agreed-upon reason to wait for the vote to be complete first?
I would, but it could be a prima donna, get-out-of-my-spotlight thing. It's not like I have anything urgent to propose, ever. Or, hell, anything period.