Mal ,'Safe'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Sure. And because I didn't have much invested in the issue, and because I don't have access to B.org during the work day anymore, I didn't.
I'm just hypothesizing here, Jon, not accusing y'all of anything. I don't know how it would have been possible to make it less confusing. But it was absolutely confusing. That's all I'm saying.
No need to snap.
It's a complicated question. If you don't participate in the mitigation process, or ask questions about the ballot when it's been finalised ... well, that's a risk you run.
I don't know how the ballot itself could have been made simpler, but it is clear how each voter could have made sure they understood it.
I wouldn't be surprised if people were so confused by the ballot they just voted no on principle
I would be surprised. It's not like people here are reticent with complaints or questions if something's not clear. And if someone wanted the thread, why vote "no" on principle? Why not vote "yes" to everything?
Actually, I was confused as to what was meant by "spoiler" and thought that as written it seemed that any spoilers of any kind (i.e. even before airing) would be fair game if I voted yes but "no whitefont ever." By the time I got to the end of the thread to say that might be more clear, the ballot was already up.
Granted, it's been a busy week, but I thought I was keeping up until that happened.
Other than the spoiler question, I thought it was pretty clear.
I agree, except that the way I interpreted the whitefont issue (that is, I hate whitefont but didn't want to see real spoilers in there) almost made me vote no on everything, when in fact I do want some sort of TV thread despite being somewhat anti-proliferation.
No need to snap.
Sorry, I didn't mean to come across that way.
I don't know how the ballot itself could have been made simpler, but it is clear how each voter could have made sure they understood it.
What ita said.
Seconding Jon's seconding of ita. And I was going to ask for clarification about the ballot in Bureau when Vortex beat me to it.
I certainly didn't mean to suggest that because I was confused things should have been done differently. It was more wishful thinking that I wasn't the only one.
Well, it's hardly the first time I've been confused by things that other people found transparent.
And my vote alone clearly wouldn't have made a difference. So.
You guys are confusing me.