Shouldn't this list include actuaries?
Don't forget librarians!
I like both Teppy's and Allyson's dedications.
'Touched'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Shouldn't this list include actuaries?
Don't forget librarians!
I like both Teppy's and Allyson's dedications.
If we're describing a big portion of us, we're missing programmers (or whatever the term should be). There's got to be like 30 computer experts on the board, at least. But too many descriptions, like warnings on pill bottles, gets unwieldy.
Buffistas.org: A community that heckles bad grammar. We own televisions. Brace yourself.
ALso, from the secretaries day discussion, it seems a lot of us are "administrative professionals", too! Although this is getting very unweildy
I like it just the way Allyson wrote it.
Of course we're not going to list all the possible things that we are. It gives a taste of the fact that we are varied.
I think that movies should be italicised and TV shows can stand upright on their own. Sure, I lost the battle (waged perhaps only in my own head) on the front page, but still.
I think that movies should be italicised and TV shows can stand upright on their own.
Style manuals disagree.
Of course we're not going to list all the possible things that we are. It gives a taste of the fact that we are varied.
Look at you with the rational!
(though it might be worth throwing in erinaceous' job too -- so freakin cool if I could remember the name)
Style manuals disagree.
Style manuals are free to.
The odd thing is that I was just in the middle of a watch and post, and we started debating serial commas and quotation marks. I was this close to saying something about "conversation #67" when I remembered I was over at the Dodgers blog I post on, not here.