ALso, from the secretaries day discussion, it seems a lot of us are "administrative professionals", too! Although this is getting very unweildy
Gunn ,'Power Play'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I like it just the way Allyson wrote it.
Of course we're not going to list all the possible things that we are. It gives a taste of the fact that we are varied.
I think that movies should be italicised and TV shows can stand upright on their own. Sure, I lost the battle (waged perhaps only in my own head) on the front page, but still.
I think that movies should be italicised and TV shows can stand upright on their own.
Style manuals disagree.
Of course we're not going to list all the possible things that we are. It gives a taste of the fact that we are varied.
Look at you with the rational!
(though it might be worth throwing in erinaceous' job too -- so freakin cool if I could remember the name)
Style manuals disagree.
Style manuals are free to.
The odd thing is that I was just in the middle of a watch and post, and we started debating serial commas and quotation marks. I was this close to saying something about "conversation #67" when I remembered I was over at the Dodgers blog I post on, not here.
You were involved in someone else's serial comma discussion? t /wounded and betrayed
Other people have serial comma discussion? I thought we were unique!
That's not the right question. The right question is who won?
Heh.
Also. We are the ineffable Buffistas. Is it not enough to post, and not to eff?