Buffy ,'Dirty Girls'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I am merely following the instructions of the lovely and talented Jon. Tell me where and to what and with what verbiage, and we'll be good to go.
I'm lovely? Really? swoons
Let's get a good Rules document together, and then we can decide where to put it (though I do like the slash potential with Etiquette).
I'll be in my bunk.
Do we have room for "Rules & Etiquette" instead of "Rules/Etiquette"? In this case, the slash implications are disturbing even to me.Has anyone checked amy's Buffista Passport, lately? It's like I don't even know her.
It's the incest squick. I'll note that I have nothing against, say, Etiquette/Grammar.
Jon, I can easily sit down and squash Rules and Etiquette into one Don't Do That! Do That Other Thing! document. I remember with the first draft of the lawspeak there was a lot of redundancy we cut out, so it would basically be putting the redundancy back in again and reinserting it.
be putting the redundancy back in again
"Now with more redundancy extra!"
msbelle's currently working on assembling the votes results into a rules document -- prefacing that with a "how we vote" seems sensical. I think rolling the etiquette into that is a bit much, though. A lot of stuff.
I remember with the first draft of the lawspeak there was a lot of redundancy we cut out, so it would basically be putting the redundancy back in again and reinserting it.Because redundancy is what Buffistas do best. Also, of the things Buffistas do, redundancy is that at which we're best.
So are we also good at doing the same thing again and again?