That's what you get for not reading your own tagline.
Buffy? I like that. That girl's so hot, she's buffy.
Forrest ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Aims - Apr 14, 2005 5:31:38 pm PDT #4439 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Jon B. - Apr 14, 2005 5:35:55 pm PDT #4440 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I am merely following the instructions of the lovely and talented Jon. Tell me where and to what and with what verbiage, and we'll be good to go.
I'm lovely? Really? swoons
Let's get a good Rules document together, and then we can decide where to put it (though I do like the slash potential with Etiquette).
NoiseDesign - Apr 14, 2005 5:57:16 pm PDT #4441 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
I'll be in my bunk.
Sean K - Apr 14, 2005 11:39:33 pm PDT #4442 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Topic!Cindy - Apr 15, 2005 2:51:43 am PDT #4443 of 10001
What is even happening?
Do we have room for "Rules & Etiquette" instead of "Rules/Etiquette"? In this case, the slash implications are disturbing even to me.Has anyone checked amy's Buffista Passport, lately? It's like I don't even know her.
amych - Apr 15, 2005 3:35:37 am PDT #4444 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
It's the incest squick. I'll note that I have nothing against, say, Etiquette/Grammar.
Nutty - Apr 15, 2005 4:31:08 am PDT #4445 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
Jon, I can easily sit down and squash Rules and Etiquette into one Don't Do That! Do That Other Thing! document. I remember with the first draft of the lawspeak there was a lot of redundancy we cut out, so it would basically be putting the redundancy back in again and reinserting it.
Connie Neil - Apr 15, 2005 4:36:06 am PDT #4446 of 10001
brillig
be putting the redundancy back in again
"Now with more redundancy extra!"
§ ita § - Apr 15, 2005 4:36:43 am PDT #4447 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
msbelle's currently working on assembling the votes results into a rules document -- prefacing that with a "how we vote" seems sensical. I think rolling the etiquette into that is a bit much, though. A lot of stuff.
Topic!Cindy - Apr 15, 2005 4:45:22 am PDT #4448 of 10001
What is even happening?
I remember with the first draft of the lawspeak there was a lot of redundancy we cut out, so it would basically be putting the redundancy back in again and reinserting it.Because redundancy is what Buffistas do best. Also, of the things Buffistas do, redundancy is that at which we're best.