I'm for more stealth. I want to be more under the radar rather than less.
And I love the new title of this new thread. It's shiny!
Come on. You drop by for a cup of coffee, and the world's not ending? Please.
Connor ,'Not Fade Away'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Kat - Apr 14, 2004 12:30:37 pm PDT #35 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:31:57 pm PDT #36 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Terminology check:
Title: Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
Description:
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Slug: Administrative discussions
Yes?
If so, slugs are googleable, descriptions are not.
Lyra Jane - Apr 14, 2004 12:33:37 pm PDT #37 of 10001
Up with the sun
Thanks, ita.
In that case, replace "Wonderfalls" with "that show" in the slug. Or, you know, something clever-er.
I'm not feeling very clever today.
Aims - Apr 14, 2004 12:34:37 pm PDT #38 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Do we absolutely need to have a slug? Can't we just have a title and a description?
Kat - Apr 14, 2004 12:39:33 pm PDT #39 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
slug... howabout:
Spoilers Inside!
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:41:17 pm PDT #40 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
We're already in the top 50 sites returned by Google for wonderfalls spoilers. Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
But are we, I still don't know, trying to hide from people at our front page for other reasons, or from searchers?
Kristen - Apr 14, 2004 12:48:08 pm PDT #41 of 10001
I can't speak for anyone else but I'm hiding from people.
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:53:30 pm PDT #42 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I understand that urge, but think it's going to be more trouble than anything else. I mean, we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
Michele T. - Apr 14, 2004 1:02:49 pm PDT #43 of 10001
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
Yes, it will -- part of what Google indexes on is proximity of words.
we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 1:10:07 pm PDT #44 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
I know -- but not from people, which was Kristen's contention.
Also, I stand by the idea that we're not going to move up too many spots if Wonderfalls is in the slug -- the word spoilers isn't, after all.