Do we absolutely need to have a slug? Can't we just have a title and a description?
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
slug... howabout:
Spoilers Inside!
We're already in the top 50 sites returned by Google for wonderfalls spoilers
. Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
But are we, I still don't know, trying to hide from people at our front page for other reasons, or from searchers?
I can't speak for anyone else but I'm hiding from people.
I understand that urge, but think it's going to be more trouble than anything else. I mean, we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
Yes, it will -- part of what Google indexes on is proximity of words.
we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
I know -- but not from people, which was Kristen's contention.
Also, I stand by the idea that we're not going to move up too many spots if Wonderfalls is in the slug -- the word spoilers isn't, after all.
Although in the lightbulb thread "Lovesick, my Ass" seems to be an early favorite for thread title.
(I know - premature. But it seems pretty certain to pass.)
Mostly it's the slug being discussed, Gar, not the title, AFAICT.
I understand that urge, but think it's going to be more trouble than anything else.
I know it's a pipe dream.