I understand that urge, but think it's going to be more trouble than anything else. I mean, we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
'Bushwhacked'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
Yes, it will -- part of what Google indexes on is proximity of words.
we're still announcing the thread in Press, right? In Minearverse?
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
Thread pages are blocked from search spiders.
I know -- but not from people, which was Kristen's contention.
Also, I stand by the idea that we're not going to move up too many spots if Wonderfalls is in the slug -- the word spoilers isn't, after all.
Although in the lightbulb thread "Lovesick, my Ass" seems to be an early favorite for thread title.
(I know - premature. But it seems pretty certain to pass.)
Mostly it's the slug being discussed, Gar, not the title, AFAICT.
I understand that urge, but think it's going to be more trouble than anything else.
I know it's a pipe dream.
You're so cute when you're naive and full of hope.
Because the front page will come up for wonderfalls spoilers anyway.
Why? Because "wonderfalls" is in the Minearverse slug and "spoilers" is in other thread titles?
Give her time. She's only been on board for a little while.
eta: Good number, and that would be my guess, Jon.
Because "wonderfalls" is in the Minearverse slug and "spoilers" is in other thread titles?
Yup.
We're currently about site #45. Putting one more mention of Wonderfalls is probably not going to spike traffic from searches.