It's "Google's measure of the importance of this page." I think it's generated by how many people link to it.
Dawn: I feel safe with you. Spike: Take that back!
'First Date'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:11:49 pm PDT #31 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jon B. - Apr 14, 2004 12:26:55 pm PDT #32 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Do we want "Wonderfalls" in the slug? I thought we wanted it to be more stealthy.
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:29:35 pm PDT #33 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Who are we hiding from? Search engines or humans? Do search engines rank proximity? Because the front page will come up for wonderfalls spoilers anyway. Not putting Wonderfalls in the slug might make it come up less high, but the basic ship has sailed.
Lyra Jane - Apr 14, 2004 12:29:53 pm PDT #34 of 10001
Up with the sun
I couldn't remember which way we had gone on that, Jon. I thought it was okay to have it in the slug 'cos it isn't Googleable?
Kat - Apr 14, 2004 12:30:37 pm PDT #35 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I'm for more stealth. I want to be more under the radar rather than less.
And I love the new title of this new thread. It's shiny!
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:31:57 pm PDT #36 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Terminology check:
Title: Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
Description:
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Slug: Administrative discussions
Yes?
If so, slugs are googleable, descriptions are not.
Lyra Jane - Apr 14, 2004 12:33:37 pm PDT #37 of 10001
Up with the sun
Thanks, ita.
In that case, replace "Wonderfalls" with "that show" in the slug. Or, you know, something clever-er.
I'm not feeling very clever today.
Aims - Apr 14, 2004 12:34:37 pm PDT #38 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Do we absolutely need to have a slug? Can't we just have a title and a description?
Kat - Apr 14, 2004 12:39:33 pm PDT #39 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
slug... howabout:
Spoilers Inside!
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2004 12:41:17 pm PDT #40 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
We're already in the top 50 sites returned by Google for wonderfalls spoilers. Mentioning the show in the slug isn't going to change that much.
But are we, I still don't know, trying to hide from people at our front page for other reasons, or from searchers?