Whoa. Good myth.

Wash ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Topic!Cindy - Apr 16, 2004 4:32:21 am PDT #101 of 10001
What is even happening?

If a bunch of us go click on the other links that google brings up, can we send the Buffista link even further down? ijs


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2004 4:33:05 am PDT #102 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

can we send the Buffista link even further down?

That's not how google works.


Sue - Apr 16, 2004 4:33:29 am PDT #103 of 10001
hip deep in pie

I think it helps more if you link to other things...


Topic!Cindy - Apr 16, 2004 4:33:55 am PDT #104 of 10001
What is even happening?

How, Sue?


Sue - Apr 16, 2004 4:36:16 am PDT #105 of 10001
hip deep in pie

I think that the google ranking has to do partly with how many places link to you, as well as the tendency for people to click on the link. But my understanding is pretty basic.

I know that when people googlebomb, they want people to link to their sites, because that's how they get a higher result on Google.


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2004 4:36:32 am PDT #106 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

By having a web page that google hits that links to other sites with the same search terms.

I really doubt it's worth the effort -- googlebombing takes a lot of effort.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 16, 2004 4:59:47 am PDT #107 of 10001
What is even happening?

It must. Understanding it all is taking more energy than I have this morning.


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2004 5:03:57 am PDT #108 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

From the google site:

PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important."

Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank, which Google remembers each time it conducts a search. Of course, important pages mean nothing to you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears on a page and examines all aspects of the page's content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query.

I don't see how the number of hits can factor in, since this is information that Google wouldn't have.

Altering a PageRank. GoogleBombing, takes a whole lot of pages that Google lends credence to. Not easy. There's an effort underway to GoogleBomb the current #1 hit for jew, and although it seems lots of people are participating, nothing yet.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 16, 2004 5:21:11 am PDT #109 of 10001
What is even happening?

I don't see how the number of hits can factor in, since this is information that Google wouldn't have.

I am not sure if that's what I meant or not. I just meant googling Wonderfalls, and on the google page, then selecting every page that isn't ours. Wouldn't google know what we select from their own site? Regardless, now that you've explained the stuff above, I can see it would be like a tear drop in the ocean.

There's an effort underway to GoogleBomb the current #1 hit for jew, and although it seems lots of people are participating, nothing yet.

For "jew"? To what end, do you know?


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2004 5:22:53 am PDT #110 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I am not sure if that's what I meant or not.

That was to Sue, actually.

To what end, do you know?

Try the search. You'll see.