And I myself will be wearing pink taffeta as chenille would not go with my complexion.

Giles ,'Touched'


LotR - The Return of the King: "We named the *dog* 'Strider'".  

Frodo: Please, what does it always mean, this... this "Aragorn"? Elrond: That's his name. Aragorn, son of Arathorn. Aragorn: I like "Strider." Elrond: We named the *dog* "Strider".

A discussion of Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King. If you're a pervy hobbit fancier, this is the place for you.


Cindy - Dec 23, 2003 1:53:31 am PST #715 of 3902
Nobody

scrappy, you are not alone regarding your feelings about Aragorn/Arwen, nor regarding your impression(s) of Eowyn--from first to last.

But as it was, it was about ten minutes where it was Frodo Is Dead, No Wait, He's Fine And Happy, Well Maybe He's A Bit Alienated, Oh Hey He's Completely Incapable Of Enjoying Life. Not enough time to sell the impact everything had on Frodo.

Now--don't get me wrong--I wish they'd been able to include the Scouring of the Shire, but I think Jackson sold us a steady diet of the impact that everything had on Frodo, throughout the movies, and didn't need to sell it at the end. We had this happy little hobbit, who grew thin, and pale, and wraith-like, and was slowly corrupted to the point where he more strongly identified with Gollum-Smeagol than with Sam. He couldn't remember what strawberries taste like. I was already there. The translation of this book to film didn't thrill me the way FotR did, but things like that worked.

Of course, I'm not very far from Sean when it comes to Faramir, either.

And just because I've been meaning to post this since Saturday night: * PIPPIN'S SINGING BROKE ME. *

eta...

That said, am I the only person who returns to the books and doesn't imagine the movie actors? They just fall away. There I am, thinking Aragorn's kind of a jerk again and Frodo is much thinner and browner and not nearly as pretty as Elijah Wood.

I didn't re-attempt the books (tried them when I was too young, and not so interested) until after FotR, so I keep the movie's actors in my mind. I know what you mean though, although for me, it's usually better to keep the people my brain gave me. For example, no film version of Little Women has ever replaced my head's own pictures of them, but that's good.


Micole - Dec 23, 2003 1:58:59 am PST #716 of 3902
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

I love Eowyn. I like Aragorn/Arwen. Strangely, do not find them mutually exclusive. I wish Liv Tyler had less wispiness and more gravitas, and think she did best in the first film, when (not coincidentally) she was given the most varied stuff to do; but I do think that the problem lies in the writing emphasizing a mystical connection between the two of them and not the length and depth of their attachment. Still, the greatness of Arwen's sacrifice to be with Aragorn comes through.

Also, I have strong residual Faramir/Eowyn leanings from the books, because when I was twelve it made perfect sense for my two favorite characters to get together just because they were my favorites.


Micole - Dec 23, 2003 2:00:09 am PST #717 of 3902
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

I know what you mean though, although for me, it's usually better to keep the people my brain gave me.

Oh, it is better. I'm sure if I tried I could imagine the actors in, but I don't want to. The books and the movies are separate experiences.

ETA - Okay, Gandalf does look more Ian-McKellan-like than he used to.


Cindy - Dec 23, 2003 2:05:23 am PST #718 of 3902
Nobody

Ian just *is* Gandalf. I don't think you can blame your brain-Gandalf for bowing under pressure.

eta...

It's like Clark Gable's Rhett Butler. Of course, I think I've read Gable was Mitchell's brain-Butler, too.


Kathy A - Dec 23, 2003 2:11:23 am PST #719 of 3902
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

I already had a strong picture in my head of Frodo, Sam, and the other hobbits, as well as Gandalf, but most of the others have been supplanted with the film faces (especially Boromir, just because I prefer the movie version over the book one).

I'm flying out to Seattle to see my sister and mom for Christmas today, and was talking to Mom last night. I reminded her that probably on Friday I'll be taking both of them to RotK. After chatting a bit, I asked her if she had anything planned for the day today, before I arrive, and when she said no, I suggested that she pull out my sister's dvd of TTTEE, just so she could remind herself of what happened "Previously, on Lord of the Rings..." (she saw it with me in the theater last Christmas, but hasn't seen it since). I'm hoping she does, so she'll be even more involved in RotK. She liked FotR but not excessively (she kept getting Aragorn and Boromir confused, until one of them died), and would have fallen asleep in TTT if it were any later in the day.


Volans - Dec 23, 2003 3:21:37 am PST #720 of 3902
move out and draw fire

Did we learn nothing from Castamir?

BWAH!

Oh, this made my day.


Jessica - Dec 23, 2003 3:46:12 am PST #721 of 3902
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

That said, am I the only person who returns to the books and doesn't imagine the movie actors? They just fall away. There I am, thinking Aragorn's kind of a jerk again and Frodo is much thinner and browner and not nearly as pretty as Elijah Wood.

Oh yes, except that I never thought Aragorn was a jerk. But Book!Frodo is much older than Elijah Wood.


Cindy - Dec 23, 2003 3:49:16 am PST #722 of 3902
Nobody

Yes, like what--30 years older (plus the 9 years that were hopped right over in FotR).

The one thing I missed from the FotR book was the good conspiracy between the Hobbits, to help Frodo. Film!Mippin look like they're only along for the ride, because they were stealing vegetables.


Calli - Dec 23, 2003 3:55:53 am PST #723 of 3902
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

I finally saw RotK last night. And I was awake for hours afterwards on a massive Tolkien buzz that sneered, sneered like a Nazgul, at my attempts to bludgeon it into submission with benedryl. Were there things I wasn't utterly and entirely sold on? Sure. But the movie as a whole was magnificient. I loved the entire Shelob section, the fight for Minas Tirth, Eowyn kicking ass, Legolas doing anything (and the look at his face before the last battle. It seemed so much like, "I could be on a boat right now. Am I insane?"). All of the Pippen and Merry stuff. The manipulation of Sam and Frodo by Gollum. The lighting of the signal fires. Faramir's scenes. Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli in the Paths of the Dead. And more. Much, much more. I put in my TT DVD at breakfast this morning because I didn't want to leave Middle Earth just yet. I can't wait to see this movie again.


Katie M - Dec 23, 2003 5:57:30 am PST #724 of 3902
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

That said, am I the only person who returns to the books and doesn't imagine the movie actors? They just fall away. There I am, thinking Aragorn's kind of a jerk again and Frodo is much thinner and browner and not nearly as pretty as Elijah Wood.

I suspect I'll take some with me and others not, and that won't necessarily have to do with whether I liked the portrayal or not. I don't think Sean Bean will be my book-Boromir, though I adored the work he did in the movies; Sean Astin, on the other hand, probably will be my book-Sam.

Oh, and I agree with you that Aragorn having to take a deep breath before turning around as King was wonderful. Loved that. I don't know that Viggo will come with me, but I think he will in spots - the dialogue with the head of the Houses of Healing, in RotK, where he's so snarky, for instance.