"...for living or dark undead..."
You guys had a riot? On account of me? A real riot?
Jayne ,'Jaynestown'
LotR - The Return of the King: "We named the *dog* 'Strider'".
Frodo: Please, what does it always mean, this... this "Aragorn"? Elrond: That's his name. Aragorn, son of Arathorn. Aragorn: I like "Strider." Elrond: We named the *dog* "Strider".
A discussion of Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King. If you're a pervy hobbit fancier, this is the place for you.
Kate P. - Apr 21, 2004 6:32:37 pm PDT #2546 of 3902
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love
Scrappy - Apr 21, 2004 6:40:02 pm PDT #2547 of 3902
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
But smiting is not a word people use in conversation. It's a word we are more comfortable reading rather than hearing. It takes a second to process and slows down the impact. In film you don't want people puzzling over information, because they are being given new information all the time and can't go back to clarify or take time to savor things as they can with a novel. The films keeps rushuing forward and the audience needs to stay with it.
amych - Apr 21, 2004 6:40:41 pm PDT #2548 of 3902
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
But smiting is not a word people use in conversation.
Speak for yourself.
(edit: I actually agree with your points about writing for film. I just, you know, do.)
§ ita § - Apr 21, 2004 6:46:32 pm PDT #2549 of 3902
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Tolkien wrote very booky books. PJ had a million things to do to translate to screen. Pacing and interleaving, action and dialogue. I've read the books, love the books, and am really glad there wasn't a huge amount of verbatim Tolkien.
Consuela - Apr 21, 2004 8:30:50 pm PDT #2550 of 3902
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
Actually, I was shocked at how much dialog made it to the screen unchanged. Re-arranged, moved from one character to another, and edited, but still very recognizeable for a geek like me. It was a pleasant surprise.
JohnSweden - Apr 21, 2004 9:41:47 pm PDT #2551 of 3902
I can't even.
I've read the books, love the books, and am really glad there wasn't a huge amount of verbatim Tolkien.
I'm not saying there should be a lot more. The speeches that were used were very effective. I'm saying when you use a speech word for word, have the courage to use the words. In a fealty/oath-based society, oathbreaking is powerful stuff. Smite is better for the Witch-king, because killing? That horse has bolted. Biggest undead creature active in middle-earth needs some smiting.
Scrappy - Apr 21, 2004 9:51:06 pm PDT #2552 of 3902
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Not sure what ypu mean by the horse bolting. Thje word is overused? Is "love" overused? Some words see a lot of use because they are the most clear and direct way of stating something. Smite sounds weaker than kill and strength is what is needed there--especially as it's a woman saying the line.
Kathy A - Apr 21, 2004 10:21:47 pm PDT #2553 of 3902
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil
Actually, I was shocked at how much dialog made it to the screen unchanged. Re-arranged, moved from one character to another, and edited, but still very recognizeable for a geek like me. It was a pleasant surprise.
I'm with you, Consuela. Just about every time that they managed to include a memorable section of dialogue, even if it was truncated, I got the chills. I had convinced myself that they would cut out the Wheel of Fire speech, but not only did they include [most of] it, but they moved it to the key emotional moment in the entire film. And when Elrond began the linnod of Gilraen's, and Aragorn ended it? I nearly shouted, "Yes!" in the theater.
And they were pretty subtle about some of the references. I was giggling at my first FotR viewing over Gandalf's line "If you're referring to that business with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door," and my mother (not a Tolkien fan) was wondering what the heck I found so funny.
helentm - Apr 22, 2004 12:50:29 am PDT #2554 of 3902
Religion isn't the cause of wars. It's the excuse. - Christopher Brookmyre
Yeah, that Hobbit joke was hysterical. Months after I first saw FOTR, I'd remember it and snicker quietly.
Glad to hear I'm not alone. The thing for me is, that scene where Sam thinks Frodo's dead, and takes the Ring, I always cry at. It's the most emotional moment in the book for me. And that whole scene with Gollum was just...so against the characters. Sam wouldn't leave Frodo, and Frodo always trusts in Sam, while he's got any sanity left. It's just like the thing in the mines of Moria. Never mind that they're miles underground, surrounded by orcs, in this incredibly claustrophobic place, Peter Jackson has to add Falling!Slabs!of!Doom. These scenes don't need daft plot twists, there's plenty of tension in them already.
Anyway. Ahem. I like lots of all the movies, I'm just quite bitter about a few moments.
MechaKrelboyne - Apr 22, 2004 3:31:51 am PDT #2555 of 3902
... and that's a Pantera's box you don't want to open. - Mister Furious
Speak for yourself.
Beat me to it. I use smite on an almost daily basis.
Not sure what ypu mean by the horse bolting.I took that as a 'But he's already dead' thing. I could be wrong.
Smite sounds weaker than kill and strength is what is needed there--especially as it's a woman saying the line.
See, I just don't see where smite sounds weak at all. To me it always rings stonger than kill, maim, or even defenestrate. I think she would've come across a lot more badass with Smite. I also don't think it's a word people need to ponder overly much. It just seems a natural thing to me.