Here is your cup of coffee.  Brewed from the finest Colombian lighter fluid.

Xander ,'Chosen'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


deborah grabien - Jun 16, 2004 9:12:45 pm PDT #3386 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Connie, see, I always read Hamlet with an eye toward the history he was playing with. So the subplots there - the Players just kill me, and the incredible layers of hoyay in there - were never really more than a mild distraction to me; of course, the play itself needed an editor, I thought (waits to be struck by lightning for heresy).

My problem with Ophelia is that I never once bought her as in love with Hamlet, or Hamlet as in love with her. It was the one of Shakespeare's "great" tragedies that I thought got away from him, in a lot of levels.

But the core - murder! ghosts! implied son-mother incest longing! impled hoyay between Hamlet and (insert young male character of choice here!) obsession! - is just a great little chunk of melodrama. I wish he'd left it that way, and trimmed it up a bit.


Connie Neil - Jun 16, 2004 9:13:51 pm PDT #3387 of 10002
brillig

dammit, past midnight. Unfortunately, once I passed 40, sleep no longer became optional. Good night, all.


deborah grabien - Jun 16, 2004 9:16:17 pm PDT #3388 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Is Claudius skewered? Because it's the skewering that makes me giggle. If so, that's a three-fer!

Bad fungi, which he basically knows is coming. But he plays it exactly as he played Claudius, right down to the stammer. Perfection.

Dudes, you have GOT to see the miniseries. There has never been anything quite like it. I mean, ever. Period. It's fucking brilliant and totally nuts and the scene in which John Hurt's barking mad Caligula reaches out and kisses his grandmother Livia goodnight - with one hand on her breast and his tongue down her throat and Sian Phillips' eyes (she played Livia) going wide with shock, because Hurt hadn't told her he'd be doing it - oh, lordy, lordy.

edit: OH! And I mustn't forget: Patrick Stewart, with HAIR! Playing Sejanus, and talking sexy-dirty.

When we wrote our ST:TNG teleplay, "Guinan in Wonderland", we had the head of the Romulan fleet confronting Picard. And we called him Sejanus.


P.M. Marc - Jun 16, 2004 10:15:05 pm PDT #3389 of 10002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Dudes, you have GOT to see the miniseries. There has never been anything quite like it. I mean, ever. Period. It's fucking brilliant and totally nuts and the scene in which John Hurt's barking mad Caligula reaches out and kisses his grandmother Livia goodnight - with one hand on her breast and his tongue down her throat and Sian Phillips' eyes (she played Livia) going wide with shock, because Hurt hadn't told her he'd be doing it - oh, lordy, lordy.

I know. My mother has kindly forced her boxed set on us. They have the coffee table book on it. They're quite the fans.


Sophia Brooks - Jun 17, 2004 2:15:15 am PDT #3390 of 10002
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

I think I am the weird person who had LESS trouble reading Ulyssess (though I did read it for a class in Irish Renaissance Literature) than Watership Down.

The advantage I had for Ulyssess was that it was the professors thesis topic, and he had written his own guide. I liked the gude almost better than the book. For me the pleasure of Ulysses was the pleasure of analysis rather than just the pleasure of reading. It was like digging for buried treasure, finding all the referances.

Also, I never have finished Watership Down.


Fred Pete - Jun 17, 2004 3:25:36 am PDT #3391 of 10002
Ann, that's a ferret.

I think I am the weird person who had LESS trouble reading Ulyssess (though I did read it for a class in Irish Renaissance Literature) than Watership Down.

Ulysses (probably Joyce generally, and very possibly -- at the risk of overgeneralizing -- much Modernism) would probably benefit from being read in class, or with some other guide.


Jessica - Jun 17, 2004 4:20:27 am PDT #3392 of 10002
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Unfortunately, Deb, Connie was asking about Hamlet. *g*

Ah! For a second, I thought Deb was talking about Brannagh's Hamlet, and I was terribly sad that she would now have to be dead to me. But his Henry V's a whole nother thing.

For film versions of Hamlet, I like the Almereyda (Ethan Hawke) one, because it got this:

of course, the play itself needed an editor, I thought (waits to be struck by lightning for heresy).

exactly right. It strips the play down to its bare bones and truly adapts it, instead of just dressing its actors up in period outfits and slapping itself on the back for doing such an Important Shakespeare Play.


Nutty - Jun 17, 2004 4:30:29 am PDT #3393 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

My upbringing is such that I've seen a lot of Hamlets, but all strung together on a bizarro "Greatest Hits of the English Department" video, just the highlight scenes and with several versions in a row. Derek Jacobi's Hamlet had extremely 70s hair, and wore tights. (I think there was also a Nicol Williamson Hamlet, but I disremember.)

The problem is, when you're used to the highlight reel, the whole play is unbelieveably dull. Also, the highlight reel tends to cut out all but the best parts of Hamlet puttering around being insecure -- and frankly, if I didn't know he is destined to die, I'd kill him myself, just to stop with the irritating worry. It bothers me that the play could be only 15 minutes long (and probably not count as a tragedy), if Hamlet weren't such a worrywart. That's just not my kind of play, I guess.

My favorite Richard III was "Looking for Richard", which explained a lot to me, what with the actors saying "My motivation is...". Also had the nice effect of cutting out the slow parts.

Shakespeare has a lot of slow parts, doesn't he? Or, he doesn't tend to transmit plot information in a very efficient manner; it's rare I would cut entire scenes, but given my druthers I'd cut a lot of lines in each scene.

The funny thing about Henry V is that neither of the famous versions includes the part where Heroic Hal orders all of his French prisoners executed in revenge. Makes it a much more ambiguous play, you know? Harder to lionize war when even the good guy is a wanton butcher.


Vortex - Jun 17, 2004 4:40:54 am PDT #3394 of 10002
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

And I hated the film versions, as well, because the historian in me can't stomach the carricature.

really? I quite liked the one set in the 30's with Ian McKellan.


Calli - Jun 17, 2004 4:45:36 am PDT #3395 of 10002
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

I loved Brannagh's Henry V to bits. Never saw Olivier's. When it comes to Hamlet I've yet to see a version that I can wholeheartedly love. In Mel Gibson's version, well, the problems are right there in front of you. But Helena Bonhem Carter did the best Ophelia I've ever seen. I liked Brannagh's portrayl of Hamlet, but I think someone else should have directed the movie, preferably someone who could sit on KB's enormous ego every 5 minutes or so.

My favorite WS play is The Tempest. The High Point (NC) Shakespeare Festival put on a wonderful version several years ago -- period clothes and very, very minimalist sets. I just fell into the play and came up gasping a few hours later. But I'm still waiting for a decent movie version. I'd love to see Ian McKellan as Prospero, but he might be kind of tired of wizard types by now.