Unfortunately, Deb, Connie was asking about Hamlet. *g*

Ah! For a second, I thought Deb was talking about Brannagh's Hamlet, and I was terribly sad that she would now have to be dead to me. But his Henry V's a whole nother thing.

For film versions of Hamlet, I like the Almereyda (Ethan Hawke) one, because it got this:

of course, the play itself needed an editor, I thought (waits to be struck by lightning for heresy).

exactly right. It strips the play down to its bare bones and truly adapts it, instead of just dressing its actors up in period outfits and slapping itself on the back for doing such an Important Shakespeare Play.

My upbringing is such that I've seen a lot of Hamlets, but all strung together on a bizarro "Greatest Hits of the English Department" video, just the highlight scenes and with several versions in a row. Derek Jacobi's Hamlet had extremely 70s hair, and wore tights. (I think there was also a Nicol Williamson Hamlet, but I disremember.)

The problem is, when you're used to the highlight reel, the whole play is unbelieveably dull. Also, the highlight reel tends to cut out all but the best parts of Hamlet puttering around being insecure -- and frankly, if I didn't know he is destined to die, I'd kill him myself, just to stop with the irritating worry. It bothers me that the play could be only 15 minutes long (and probably not count as a tragedy), if Hamlet weren't such a worrywart. That's just not my kind of play, I guess.

My favorite Richard III was "Looking for Richard", which explained a lot to me, what with the actors saying "My motivation is...". Also had the nice effect of cutting out the slow parts.

Shakespeare has a lot of slow parts, doesn't he? Or, he doesn't tend to transmit plot information in a very efficient manner; it's rare I would cut entire scenes, but given my druthers I'd cut a lot of lines in each scene.

The funny thing about Henry V is that neither of the famous versions includes the part where Heroic Hal orders all of his French prisoners executed in revenge. Makes it a much more ambiguous play, you know? Harder to lionize war when even the good guy is a wanton butcher.

And I hated the film versions, as well, because the historian in me can't stomach the carricature.

really? I quite liked the one set in the 30's with Ian McKellan.

I loved Brannagh's Henry V to bits. Never saw Olivier's. When it comes to Hamlet I've yet to see a version that I can wholeheartedly love. In Mel Gibson's version, well, the problems are right there in front of you. But Helena Bonhem Carter did the best Ophelia I've ever seen. I liked Brannagh's portrayl of Hamlet, but I think someone else should have directed the movie, preferably someone who could sit on KB's enormous ego every 5 minutes or so.

My favorite WS play is The Tempest. The High Point (NC) Shakespeare Festival put on a wonderful version several years ago -- period clothes and very, very minimalist sets. I just fell into the play and came up gasping a few hours later. But I'm still waiting for a decent movie version. I'd love to see Ian McKellan as Prospero, but he might be kind of tired of wizard types by now.

really? I quite liked the one set in the 30's with Ian McKellan.

Me too. It's totally sweet.

My favorite WS play is The Tempest.

I've tried to figure out what's so great about this play, and I can't. I've read it once and seen it performed by the Actors from the London Stage, but it still doesn't do an exceeding amount for me. It's so meanderingly plotless.

I think my favorite tragedy is Lear, because it has like fifty thousand character arcs. And eye-gouging. For comedies, I think I go with Much Ado, which also has a great Branagh movie.

You really need to spend a weekend with Jen chatting up all the dark twisty corners of Wm. Shakespeare.

Yes please.

Somehow, I think Shakespeare might be the last thing on our minds... IJS.

Damn, damn, damn. Missed a lot of the Hamlet/Henry V movie discussion, but it's not like I have anything new. I bloody well hate Branagh's movie with the fury of a thousand suns. 5 million points from Gryffindor, indeed.

For film versions of Hamlet, I like the Almereyda (Ethan Hawke) one, because it got this

Really? See, my mother, myself, and Zach sat down to watch it one day, and we were painfully bored by the time Laertes is setting off. To the point where my mother asked if we could shut it off, which was a first.

I love that everyone was is talking about R&G. Has anyone else seen Stoppard's Dogg's Hamlet/Cahoot's MacBeth? Bloody brilliant, and it does have Hamlet in 15 minutes. And then Hamlet in 90 seconds for an encore.

We are delving far into Richard III right now, because Z is directing it next year and I'm the one who has the patience for the history plays.

The funny thing about Henry V is that neither of the famous versions includes the part where Heroic Hal orders all of his French prisoners executed in revenge. Makes it a much more ambiguous play, you know?

Yup.

My favorite WS play is The Tempest.

I've tried to figure out what's so great about this play, and I can't.

For me it's all about the language. I think this play is his most lyrical and beautifully written. I do agree that he wrote several other plays with more gripping plots.

My favorite WS play is The Tempest.

You know how sometimes you will see a show, and it was either so good or so horrific that you never want to see it again? Yeah. I got burned on The Tempest a few summers ago. Shakespeare in the Park (here), Prospero and Miranda were both TV actors imported from LA and had no idea how to act on stage, and just... eugh. Caliban rocked, though.

We are delving far into Richard III right now, because Z is directing it next year and I'm the one who has the patience for the history plays.

Heh. It's hard for me to think of Richard III as a history, because it feels so much like one of his regular plays. Like Hamlet as told from Claudius' point-of-view. The villain is your protagonist; how cool is that?

For me it's all about the language. I think this play is his most lyrical and beautifully written.

Yeah, I think that's usually the reason I've heard given. O brave new play, with such language in it.

I love the scene in Richard III where Richard talks Anne around at her own husband's funeral. It's so gloriously creepy. Oddly, I've never seen any of the movies of RIII.

"Ran" is heartbreaking. Especially the ending, where the poor guy up on the plateau drops his picture of Buddha, the only thing which has been giving him any comfort. Damn. I either shut the movie off right before that scene, or I spend the next hour weeping because I can't reach into the screen and pick it up for him.