I'm not including that. I'm talking about killing her entire family, impersonating a priest in order to convince her that she was evil, driving her mad.
See, that? Not as evil as making her a vampire in my book (which comes with free murder attached.), except for the killing the whole family, which is more of the mass-murder is bad theme.
The first, in my book.
The same, in my book. Once you've killed more than a couple of people, you're pretty much in the "must be permanently removed from society" category, and as vampires aren't subject to human justice, that pretty much means dustage.
So you why would you hate it?
I didn't say I hate the bear, I asked which man-eating tiger I should hate more. I did imply that I sympathized with the hiker and I do.
As for vampires, people are food for them.
I'm afraid I don't accept the Entity Relativism of that statement. We are the food. Vampires aren't bears or sharks. They are self-aware, thus the whole demons, damned, etc. They know they are performing evil acts and they revel in it. The humahhns are on my side, I am on theirs. The vampires are by definition the bad guys and they like it. This makes them not okay.
I've maintained for ages that there is no way he should have made it through season 5 undusted.
He doesn't make it to Season 5 if I get to script the Scoobies. :)
his character, up until he got a soul, was a very interesting exercise in evil and good and all the steps in between
I didn't go along on the voyage of the Shades of Grey Treader, but now we get into the old old chip is not a soul territory and that is soo Season Six, doh I said Season Six, ack! I said it again! Must scrub brain twice now!