He wasn't trying to help Buffy regain her own life. He was telling her she was dark, like him

Here I believe he thought she was like him. He wasn't trying to convert her, but to open her eyes.

I couldn't figure out why people thought the demon egg-capades were out of character, in AYW.

Because it was dumb? Put him in peril?

I had a little of that cognitive dissonance, but it was resolved by my saying to myself "Right, he's still evil". Even when he wasn't trying to be or was actively trying to be "good". No moral compass

He wasn't trying to help Buffy regain her own life. He was telling her she was dark, like him

Here I believe he thought she was like him. He wasn't trying to convert her, but to open her eyes.

Me, too. Buffy's had a lot of people tell her she was dark (First Slayer and Dracula come immediately to mind), hasn't she?

Spike was my great learning experience on How Fandom Interaction Can Impact Your Opinion Of A Character.

This is also true for me.

Oh yeah. Gospel.

He wasn't trying to help Buffy regain her own life. He was telling her she was dark, like him

Here I believe he thought she was like him. He wasn't trying to convert her, but to open her eyes.

I agree, but that certainly doesn't tell me he's good, or grown beyond the evil. Were he good (or good enough), he would have realized sooner, that his relationship with Buffy was destroying most of what he loved about her, and that she was screwed up enough to not care. I do think he honestly thought she was like him, now (well, then) though. Was it in his little rant in Normal Again, that he sort of realized she wasn't? I think he called her a martyr.

I couldn't figure out why people thought the demon egg-capades were out of character, in AYW.

Because it was dumb? Put him in peril?

I probably should have qualified that, because there were two (common) reasons I saw around fandom, for people rejecting that. The most common (and not here, but it was the one I had in mind when I made that post) was that Spike wouldn't do anything bad, now (then).

The dumb/put-him-in-peril angle is the other, and wasn't what I was thinking of, but it didn't ping as OoC, so much as not the best (writing) idea. This is the character that got Dru the Judge jigsaw puzzle, and then found out he had enough humanity in him to offend the Judge. He let Harmony in on his gem of Amara plans, and then staked her, when she was wearing the gem. He didn't want the word to get sucked into Acathla hell, but didn't stick around to help Buffy finish off Angelus. He tied Buffy up to make her love him.

He's had plans (can't remember the particular) which he's abandoned because he got bored. I guess I saw him as emotional-enough to not think things through, and deal in the eggs for some quick cash. It's not that he's stupid (although I think he's been dumbed down in later seasons, and I do wish that hadn't happened). He is bright, but he is more impulsive than he is smart. I can see (more) where people found it OoC for the reasons you cite though, ita.

As early as Bargaining, Spike was reveling in the violence (as an observer) of the biker demons. He was telling Dawn he'd drink from her brain stem. He wasn't trying to help Buffy regain her own life. He was telling her she was dark, like him. He was playing poker with demons, for kittens. He was offering to steal. His reaction to Buffy in OM,WF was essentially 'first I'll kill her, then I'll save her.'

Except for the encouraging Buffy to go dark, I don't see any of those things as being indicative of anything other than a man with a blunt way of expressing himself and a world view of "me and mine first". Yeah, he's not Lifetime Movie Hero material, but not balls-out evil either.

Yeah, I think they leaned too hard on the assumption that people would stick with "soulless vampire = evil."

In retrospect, I think a lot of the appeal to various people *of* Spike was the whole notion of goodness by choice, rather than by something innate (soul). Which, y'know, big picture and all, kind of completely undermines the moral framework of the fictional universe.

Except for the encouraging Buffy to go dark, I don't see any of those things as being indicative of anything other than a man with a blunt way of expressing himself and a world view of "me and mine first". Yeah, he's not Lifetime Movie Hero material, but not balls-out evil either.

Without his history as context, I'm with you connie. But see, we did have his history, and nothing showed us he "got good." Heck, if nothing else (and I can't believe I didn't mention it), we have Smashed. The minute his suspected his chip was out, he tried to feed on someone. The point is, we had no reason to think he was in redemptionville. Better than active-serial-killer isn't the equivalent of good, particularly in this 'verse.

eta...

Which, y'know, big picture and all, kind of completely undermines the moral framework of the fictional universe.

Heh, funny semi-xpost

that certainly doesn't tell me he's good, or grown beyond the evil

But it doesn't tell me he's bad at all. If he believes her darkness to be true, what evil is there in urging her to come to terms with it? Enjoying who you are is consistent for him.

As for the eggs, I believe that (my) Spike would know what they were, and that putting them in the next room was likely to get his ass killed in short order. Kind of like not taking noon walks on sunny days.

In retrospect, I think a lot of the appeal to various people *of* Spike was the whole notion of goodness by choice, rather than by something innate (soul).

Oh, absolutely! The idea of vampires as Purely Evil never bothered me personally, but I know a lot of people found the concept really upsetting and unattractive and quasi-racist.

But it doesn't tell me he's bad at all. If he believes her darkness to be true, what evil is there in urging her to come to terms with it? Enjoying who you are is consistent for him.

But we'd had since season 2, showing us just how bad he could be. We already knew he was bad. We saw him fall in love with a good person. We saw him try to approximate good from time to time, but it was usually made kind of clear that he wasn't capable of getting it. I think Spike wanted to be good, and even believed he was being made good by his love for the slayer.

The darkness he thought she belonged in—thought she should come to terms with—was the kind of darkness where you don't worry about killing one innocent because you've saved a lot of others. "Good" knows that isn't so. I saw his inability (and not his fault) to be good, like a neon sign, throughout season 6. I gave him mad props for trying, but it was pretty clear (to me) he couldn't.

As for the eggs, I believe that (my) Spike would know what they were, and that putting them in the next room was likely to get his ass killed in short order. Kind of like not taking noon walks on sunny days.

I'd have to watch it again. I can't remember particulars any more. Despite the fact that I didn't hate AYW, I never had the desire to rewatch it, like I did some scenes.

Oh, absolutely! The idea of vampires as Purely Evil never bothered me personally, but I know a lot of people found the concept really upsetting and unattractive and quasi-racist.

Sometimes, I think a lot of people are nutjobs.

But, more seriously, I've seen a couple of arguments where I now have sort of an idea as to *why* redemption sans external forces was so very important to a certain breed of Spike fan, and while I think I see where they're coming from, and am far more sympathetic to it than I would have been a year or two ago, it is still an alien concept to me.