Zoe: Preacher, don't the Bible have some pretty specific things to say about killing? Book: Quite specific. It is, however, somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.

'War Stories'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


Aims - Jan 05, 2004 9:58:06 am PST #7138 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

t sends Perkins home


Lee - Jan 05, 2004 11:10:29 am PST #7139 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

sends Perkins home

Sigh. I tried to explain to people that I had an edict from the Empress, but they didn't buy it.

Stoopid people.


helentm - Jan 05, 2004 5:43:15 pm PST #7140 of 10001
Religion isn't the cause of wars. It's the excuse. - Christopher Brookmyre

But see, I saw Xander's speech in ITW as being roughly, he's going to leave in 20 minutes. Regardless of how angry you are about the ultimatium, if you actually care about the guy you need to stop him. That he thought she was blinded by the pissed offness, and making a decision that she'd regret later. I never heard Buffy blaming.

AYW, yes, mountains of Buffy-blaming, it's just appalling. That ep gives me actual shudders everytime I give any thought at all to what it seems to be saying. But that's a season 6 issue, not season 5.


ted r - Jan 05, 2004 6:43:01 pm PST #7141 of 10001
"You got twelve, and they got twelve. The old ladies are just as good as you are." -Dr. Einstein

It seems as though the viewer is meant to agree with the "Riley got suckjobs because Buffy neglected him" interpretation.

Well, maybe I am suicidal.

It wasn't that Buffy neglected him-it was that when Riley said, "She doesn't love me," he was correct. Buffy loved the idea of Riley, more than Riley. He WAS the "rebound guy." And once he realized that, their days were inevitably numbered.

As for his "suckjobs", he didn't get involved with vamps to get off. He went to discover the meaning of the darkness he saw in Buffy (the darkness Dracula, and later Spike, saw). And to see if he could discover it in himself, as the one possible route to Buffy's really loving him.

They were both lucky he got away, because though Buffy got swept up by Xander's speech, they never could have worked out. Not because she was selfish or he was immature-but because they really were too different.


Connie Neil - Jan 05, 2004 8:03:10 pm PST #7142 of 10001
brillig

Was watching "Gargoyles" on Toon Disney tonight, and I was watching Goliath and the human woman making googly eyes at each other and I thought "My god, it's Buffy and Angel!" Then I saw the copyright date of 1995 and went, "Or are Buffy and Angel really Goliath and Alisa (or whatever her name is)?" He protects her when he can, they fight evil, when she gets turned into a gargoyle a whole new world of "what if?" opens up--I wonder if Joss watched "Gargoyle"?


helentm - Jan 05, 2004 8:57:31 pm PST #7143 of 10001
Religion isn't the cause of wars. It's the excuse. - Christopher Brookmyre

In spite of the show's enormous clue hammer, I always thought Buffy loved Riley. *Parker* was the rebound guy. She seemed happy in season 4, she genuinely cared about him.

And I can sorta see what you're saying, ted, but Riley lost a lot of points with me for blaming her for everything after he got caught. It was always his bugaboo that she wanted darkness, I didn't see that. If there was any darkness trend, I'd've thought it was more like faith's, wanting to be dark, rather than sleep with it.


DebetEsse - Jan 05, 2004 9:58:27 pm PST #7144 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.

Connie, it's "Elisa". And she's totally Buffy. Just up the brooding and I can get to Goliath=Angel. Didn't stick around for his kid, (+2 geek points for knowing:) Angela, to see how Connor she is. From what I've since seen, the show starting being worse around then. Definately right there with you, though.

Helen, Maybe it was watching everything all out oforder the first time (gotta get on season 5, now that I've exhausted Firefly), but I felt like we were getting mixed messages on Riley. That we're confused cuz the writers were. Kinda like Spike was (from what I've read/heard from the various writers) in S6. Not a clear, consistent message.

Me, personally? I was kinda off-put from the beginning by Rilkey-and-Buffy because he had way more chemistry with Willow t insert character identification issues here. He is a lesbian, after all.


Fred Pete - Jan 06, 2004 3:42:28 am PST #7145 of 10001
Ann, that's a ferret.

but I felt like we were getting mixed messages on Riley. That we're confused cuz the writers were.

Debet, nothing to do with seeing the eps out of order -- I've been riding the same hobby horse (under the "many personalities of Riley" banner) for a long time.


Jessica - Jan 06, 2004 4:00:38 am PST #7146 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I was kinda off-put from the beginning by Rilkey-and-Buffy because he had way more chemistry with Willow

Well, yeah. The beginning of Buffy/Riley was the worst written getting-of-two-characters-together in the show's history -- she went from being "Willow's friend" to the girl he was supposedly in love with in about a second and a half, for no other reason than the writers needed to have them be a couple by the middle of the season. (When I started watching the show mid-S4, they were already together, and they seemed fine. But seeing the season from the beginning, it's as if they're missing an episode.)


Frankenbuddha - Jan 06, 2004 4:04:28 am PST #7147 of 10001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

under the "many personalities of Riley" banner

Wrod. They either should have left him as goofy T.A. guy, or had Buffy dating Forrest instead, but still have Riley be the first one in the Initiative who finds out she's the slayer (this makes sense in my head, I swear).

I actually didn't mind that they wanted to make Riley a bit darker, but the reasons for it (you don't rely on me enough) were lamer than a lame duck in lametown. I think Buffy not loving him could have been more than sufficient reason to send him over to the dark side, but they'd have needed to show a little more build up.

Although, in Riley's defense, I never quite got that he blamed her for the suckjobs - that's something I think Buffy latched on to. However, any slack I'd cut him in that direction he loses because he also gave her an ultimatum - that's just bullshit. Unfortunately, it felt more like the writers giving her an ultimatum than Riley.