Spike did take the coat away from Wood - prick.
Cindy, the distinction I would make is whether things are done for good or evil. Vampires' intent is evil. Vampire killers are on the side of good. So Wood has been acting on the side of good by killing vampires. While I see your point on the vengeance thing, I still think he'd be justified in killing Spike merely because he's a vampire. The fact that he can get his rocks off because the guy killed his mother is just gravy. And for the record, your chocolate scenario is of the evil :)
That's why nobody staked Spike after he got the chip.
I thought nobody staked Spike after he got the chip because he'd been defanged. He was no longer a threat.
Spike did take the coat away from Wood
I think I need to go and rewatch, because that sounds right, but I remembered it differently.
(Of course, I like Spike's ownership of the coat in any case, and how he uses it to help create the Spike persona even now.)
I'm disturbed by Buffy's "Spike, why aren't you more savage!" exhortation. I think it was pretty low on the conscience-o-meter. As was her "Oh, Will, get over your Dark!issues."
Spike retaking his trophy? Perfectly understandable reaction. But then what happened? The edge she wanted, where has it gone? I'm disappointed in the narrative for letting that go, since I was not unhappy to be disturbed by Buffy demanding it, if that makes sense.
Willow's still waffling, and I want a payoff there.
But yeah, sanctioned Buffyverse killing is to remove present threats. Less so to prevent future threats, and rarely endorsed to punish past misdeeds.
I still think he'd be justified in killing Spike merely because he's a vampire.
Again, this doesn't add up in the Buffyverse.
Again, this doesn't add up in the Buffyverse.
Maybe the Buffyverse previous to season 6, but as far as I can see, anything goes now.
Edited to add: Sorry to be snippy. I'm just bitter at the direction the show has taken.
Spike did take the coat away from Wood - prick.
No he didn't. Wood never had the coat.
Revenge killing has
never
been shown as good in the Buffyverse. Warren's death wasn't horrific because he had a soul, it was horrific because it was torture and revenge and not in the service of protecting anyone.
I think Buffy would have been upset if she'd killed Warren to save someone immediate, because that's not quite her job, but it would have been very different.
Spike retaking his trophy? Perfectly understandable reaction. But then what happened? The edge she wanted, where has it gone? I'm disappointed in the narrative for letting that go, since I was not unhappy to be disturbed by Buffy demanding it, if that makes sense.
Nah, makes perfect sense.
For, me, Wood's desire for venegence is justified, but the method he wanted to take his vengence was not. Cordelia's desire for vengence against Xander was justfied, but the wish that Buffy had never come to Sunnydale, not so much. It is, for me, a difference between motive and method.
